View Single Post
  #17  
Old Monday, February 20, 2017
fawadhash's Avatar
fawadhash fawadhash is offline
Senior Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2017 - Roll no. 16770
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 537
Thanks: 237
Thanked 259 Times in 177 Posts
fawadhash is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahmad Abbas View Post
It would be good If you touched NSG, dual policy of non-Proliferation regime, IAEA concerns...

The comclusion would be "Proliferation begets proliferation" as Muhammad Elbaradei, former IAEA chief often comments.
In nuclear factor question I focused more on the how the nuclear issue has influenced the international politics by giving example of Indo-US alignment in context of strategic agreement. US concerns about the nuclear proliferation vis-a-vis Iran, North Korea. Indian alignment with west to contain china through concession of strategic agreement. Pakistan desire to maintain nuclear parity and contain India pushing it to china. I wonder if it can be considered right?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ahmad Abbas View Post
On India Pakistan part of the question: Arms race, cbms, Deterrence, escalation, Nuclear zero, Mutual Vulnerability, Mutual Assured Destruction and total war were the key terms from theory
On this one I focused more on claims and counterclaims of each other about terrorism on part of other. Kashmir issue as freedom fighters or terrorists? Pakistan harboring terrorists or not? India supporting terrorism via Afghanistan or not? Linking this debtate to global perspective of terrorism
__________________
There is no one to stop you from succeeding other than yourself
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to fawadhash For This Useful Post:
Yousuf Aziz (Tuesday, February 21, 2017)