View Single Post
  #7  
Old Tuesday, February 21, 2017
aminshah101's Avatar
aminshah101 aminshah101 is offline
41st CTP (OMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2012 Merit 131
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sialkot
Posts: 789
Thanks: 86
Thanked 607 Times in 300 Posts
aminshah101 has a spectacular aura aboutaminshah101 has a spectacular aura aboutaminshah101 has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Subhan Ahmad View Post
@aminshah

kindly discuss this further with me. I will be appearing for CE-2018 Insha Allah. I think if we develop preference map (indifference map) that contains many ICs. We can show that by non-satiation assumption, the consumer will always prefer the IC that is away from the origin. So the budget line that is tangent to the IC will be the one the consumer prefers and can afford to meet that level of utility. The IC below the budget line will not be preferred due to non-satiation and the IC above the budget line is not affordable. Hence we get our consumer optimum.

With the above approach, we don't have to go to the cardinal approach that requires the marginal utility per unit currency of all bundles to be equal to achieve consumer optimum.

I am just curious to discuss this because I just finished preparing consumer theory chapter from two books. :P

Your evaluation of my understanding will be very helpful. Thank You
Sure dear. Let me get through my exams on 23rd and 25th then we'll discuss it in detail Insha Allah.

As of now, I need to start prep for Business Ad & Stats from today
__________________
In order to succeed, your desire for success should be greater than your fear of failure....
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aminshah101 For This Useful Post:
Subhan Ahmad (Wednesday, February 22, 2017)