When someone makes a paper just to satisfy their inflated sense of self-worth, the result is these kinds of papers. When in any exams luck starts to matter more than hard work, then there is some serious problem with the reliability of the exam. Reliability is the first rule of any test as you might know. CSS is 0% reliable. A person who tops one years fail in the next speaks volumes of the reliability of the exam. I am not saying this because my papers went bad or anything. I am only trying to say that if luck is going to determine who is to pass and who is fail, then better throw such exams in dustbin and make recruitment on safarish instead. Atleast, we wont have to waste our precious time chasing that facade of meritocracy.
__________________
There is no one to stop you from succeeding other than yourself
|