He just asked you if nationalism could be really inclusive, while you kept explaining the dire conditions of minorities (which he already said exist and didn't need you to tell him again). Then you started telling him why minorities are marginalised, while he didn't ask you to write on that. Then you wrote about how inclusive nationalism can solve problems, while the real question was whether nationalism can be inclusive. Then you told him how inclusive nationalism can be achieved, but he never asked you that. He just wanted you to take a position if nationalism can be inclusive, and then prove it. You never did that.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk