Thread: CE-2017 Allocation Query
View Single Post
  #3  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2018
usman khalid's Avatar
usman khalid usman khalid is offline
40th CTP (DMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 22Elite CSP Medal: Members who previously received (CSP Award and Member of the Year Award ) OR (CSP award + Gold Medal + Medal of Appreciation) are eligible for this award. - Issue reason: Member of the Year: Awarded to those community members who have made invaluable contributions to the Community in the particular year - Issue reason: 2012
  
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Khairpur, Sindh
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 1,131
Thanked 2,147 Times in 983 Posts
usman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant future
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Long Live Pakistan View Post
CE-2017 ALLOCATION ISSUE

So I have been following different threads on various platforms about the allocations of CE-2017 candidates but still am unable to find any satisfactory justification.
The fact that the non-recommended candidates are not the ones with lower merits, rather appear randomly in the final result is difficult to understand
The people who are justifying by saying that it is because of Punjab quota being fulfilled. Please answer how Merit no.126, a Male Candidate from Punjab did not get allocated to any group, and another male candidate from Punjab bearing Merit no. 130 got allocated? There are various examples like this. and for every province.
Those who are saying that it may be because of character verification issues e.t.c. They are requested to read Note 3 (ii) at the end of the final result.
which means that even the recommended candidates have to go through character verification after this.

So is there any logical explanation regarding this issue?
That why around 50 candidates are not recommended for service regardless of seats being available. and why are they selected at random? What are the basis of them being not recommended?
Suppose a candidate selects only five preferences for occupational groups/services (say PAS, PSP, FSP, PAAS and IRS). Suppose his merit No. is 90 and the last candidate to be allocated to any of his four preferred choices is at merit no. 85. Then he will not be allocated irrespective of availability of seats for other groups/services. Similarly candidates repeating to improve/change group/service usually do not select all preferences. Therefore, the seats might remain vacant in case they are unable to get allocated to their desired groups.
__________________
Best end of life is not knowledge but action.
Don't limit yourself to what you think people are expecting!
Reply With Quote