Sikandar, I have to respect your opinion but to disagree at the same time.

First of all, the examiner must be a scholar level person. If the paper is for CURRENT AFFAIRS, he is NOT supposed to ask questions and MCQs of 16th, 18th, and 19th Century. He is NOT supposed to ask questions of policy related to 2013-15. This makes NO sense at all. They had no time either or the PAPER had been leaked and what we gave TODAY had been formed in an emergency.

For all those questions, there is PAKISTAN AFFAIRS paper. And remember, we have a COURSE OUTLINE which tells us what to READ and STUDY for the relevant paper. So, the examiner was just not THROUGH the course outline even for once. OR else he would have made the paper otherwise.

A system that is TOTALLY working on the basis of RATTA, that stands on RATTA and nothing else. You make a ratta of dates, see past MCQs, and win for yourself. The 'late night MCQ Cracker' guy is a winner for this examination SYSTEM; and not those to critically read and STUDY whatever had been given in OUTLINE books