View Single Post
  #121  
Old Friday, June 18, 2010
mahmood mahmood is offline
Senior Member
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CSS 2007Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 248
Thanks: 0
Thanked 303 Times in 117 Posts
mahmood has a spectacular aura aboutmahmood has a spectacular aura about
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zaheer ahmad malik View Post
ITS NOT POSSIBLE AT ALL THAT IF 266 ARE GOING TO IMPROVE HOW ONLY 13 ARE COMING DOWN IN MERIT.DEFINATELY 266 WILL COME DOWN......IT S SO SIMPLE
it could happen that the number of people improving could be more than than the number who went down on the list. as an example, lets say we have position numbers 10,11,12. and both 11 and 12 happen to have more marks than number 10. then 11 will become 10, 12 will become 11. so 10 will become 12.
so two imporve but one loses his position.
still it is hard to imagine how you could adjust 13 against 266.

my own perception is that all this error has been due to the wrong application of the tie breakers. you people know about the tie breakers?
i think i should start next thread.
__________________
Mahmood Khattak
Pakistan Customs Service
36th CTP
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mahmood For This Useful Post:
sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010), tadap (Friday, June 18, 2010)