Thread: Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2008
View Single Post
  #8  
Old Tuesday, January 04, 2011
Sikander-007 Sikander-007 is offline
40th CTP (IRS)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 63
  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 77
Thanks: 111
Thanked 90 Times in 47 Posts
Sikander-007 will become famous soon enough
Default
Well,the FPSC performance evaluation critique is really pathetic.

FPSC mentions about the performance of students in compulsory and optional subjects but does not mention its own skewed policy of discriminatory checking in optional subjects.
FPSC has not changed a tad bit.It still follows the rotten trend of awarding above average and below average to certain subjects every year.Sometimes geography gets favour and sometimes it is Islamic history.In 2010 it awarded 93 marks in Precis paper.

Inshallah i will go with facts and tell FPSC chairman that his institution is biased and there is something very fishy going on.Surely FPSC has got biased examiners.

Moreover,this institute does not know how to organise the paper.In 2010 precis paper,candidates were asked to attempt the question an antonyms and synonyms on the MCQ sheet in ten minutes.There was confusion running riot in the examination hall.Candidates didn't know whether part 8 of Question 5(a) if attempted on choice will be in slot number 8 or Part 8 of Question 5(b).

FPSC thy name is procrastination.
__________________
If all mankind minus one were of one opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind. ~ John Stuart Mill
Last edited by Last Island; Tuesday, January 04, 2011 at 11:25 AM. Reason: Mannerism before manners.
Reply With Quote