View Single Post
  #458  
Old Tuesday, March 20, 2012
Arain007's Avatar
Arain007 Arain007 is offline
Czar
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Venus
Posts: 4,106
Thanks: 2,700
Thanked 4,064 Times in 1,854 Posts
Arain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant futureArain007 has a brilliant future
Post

Of khaki and mufti

March 20th, 2012


A change of command has finally taken place at the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). The outgoing chief, Lt-Gen Ahmed Shuja Pasha, retired from service after an extension given to him by the government ended. He has been replaced by Lt-Gen Zaheerul Islam, who’s last assignment was commander of the V corps based in Karachi. The change of commander of the agency has also been marked by a statement by the prime minister that while the ISI is an important national institution, it should not be “controversial”. And the PML-N chief has said that he hopes that under a new chief the agency will not interfere in politics anymore. The latter statement is particularly relevant given the ongoing hearing of Air Marshal (retd) Asghar Khan’s petition into the Mehrangate scandal, in which the agency paid hundreds of millions of rupees to politicians in a bid to dislodge the first Benazir Bhutto government.

These statements can be juxtaposed with Chief of Army Staff General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani’s remarks of last week following the reopening of the so-called Mehrangate case at the Supreme Court. General Kayani said: “If you want to fight with history in this context, it’s your choice to do so. However, establishing institutions requires a lot of hard work and the media should be careful that their words do not undermine these [institutions]”. He noted that the American media did not criticise “as harshly as the Pakistan Army was criticised by Pakistanis”. He further elaborated: “Ruthless criticism of ISI in Pakistan was far higher than any criticism made on RAW, Mossad or the CIA in India, Israel or USA”.

First of all, let us look at his observations in the light of his decision as army chief not to interfere in the functioning of a democratic government despite provocations. In this context, since we are now embarked on a new era of civil-military relations, it is better to forget the past and look at the positive aspects of this new development and look ahead rather than back. What is unfolding now in the shape of media discussion is an act of reconciliation with the past with the intent of not repeating it. A judicial commission charged with the murder of journalist Saleem Shahzad was looking at the possibility of ISI having done the deed. In its final report it exonerated the ISI but what the commission went on to do was to propose the most far-reaching reform to-date of the ISI as an institution, which was to bring it under parliamentary scrutiny and oversight. Should that be considered a destructive act? Surprisingly, the media welcomed the proposal of reform and has asked the government to implement it.

For any meaningful reform and correction, investigation into any malfeasance of the past is needed so that remedial measures can be taken. Exemption, if that is what the army chief wants, is not the answer at all. Take the case of the money put together fraudulently for distribution to rig the 1990 election. The case was correctly brought up in 1996 after revelations were made inside parliament. It involved the then army chief and the chief of the ISI. Since the army was calling the shots and was able to dominate the judiciary — which served as handmaiden to military rulers till the emergence of the current Supreme Court — it is to be determined who was finally to blame. That would lead to correction called reform.

The finger is pointed persistently at the functioning of the ISI. Has the time not arrived to review the working of this institution and put it on a better footing so that it is viewed, not with misgivings, but with the same confidence that Indians repose in RAW and the Americans in CIA? We are lucky that we have someone like General Kayani leading the army in these difficult times who is determined to resist the temptation of staging a coup in the name of national security. General Kayani’s decision not to shelter his erstwhile boss General Musharraf from the consequences of his mistakes as military ruler has given rise to an independent judiciary which is now subjecting the democratic system to proper judicial oversight.


The extortion game

March 20th, 2012


Everyone has known for years about the extortion business in Karachi. Traders, businessmen, shopkeepers and even professionals talk openly about the bhatta they need to pay to remain in business. The consequences for those who decline to pay are well known and quite terrifying.

What is more frightening is the fact that political parties from across the country appear to have become involved in the extortion business — using it almost as a kind of officially-sanctioned sideline. The trend has become stronger and stronger over the past few years. Virtually every political party has become involved in the racket. This criminalisation of politics is obviously highly disturbing. How can we expect political leaders to preserve the rule of law, which is rapidly breaking down anyway if they cannot keep themselves away from activity punishable under the law themselves. In fact, because of the role played by the political parties, the ability to place any kind of check on extortion has vanished completely. All we are left with is dramatic gestures and rhetoric of various kinds, such as the protest staged by traders in Karachi a few days ago, and backed by political forces, who rather than stopping extortion had their own agenda in mind.

The best thing, of course, would be if the political parties themselves purged their ranks of the black sheep involving in the extortion rackets. After all, the future of the country’s financial and commercial capital is at stake. If this does not happen, the violence we see will keep becoming worse and worse, as extortionists grow bolder and demand greater and greater sums. The consequence of this — what most of the city’s residents believe — is a complete abdication of its responsibilities. Besides, what can we expect in terms of services from political parties which have lost all conscience and the ability to work within rules for the benefit of people? This simple sense of what is right has broken down completely in Karachi. To make matters worse, the police force, too, has been heavily politicised making things harder for those who wish to see an end to the extortion that is rapidly tearing our business capital apart.
__________________
Kon Kehta hy k Main Gum-naam ho jaon ga
Main tu aik Baab hn Tareekh mein Likha jaon ga
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Arain007 For This Useful Post:
tyre (Wednesday, March 21, 2012)