Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeric
Based on your comments above-mentioned allocation may be treated correct. However, there are certain candidates Merit. No. 59, 105, 112, 131 and 133 who are not allocated may be due to group preferences by mentioning only top of the groups.
|
Yes you are right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hassanshariq
It is so frustrating to see this kind of procedure. The most competitive exam of the country is no more a competition in truest sense. Competition means those who perform well should earn the fruits. CSS has been made more of a system of quotas, the fact that one is born in a province provides him with a handicap or puts him at a natural advantage. How is it justified to have people at the bottom of list be allocated and people who have performed much better be sitting empty handed.
Serious thought is required over the matter....
|
Yes i also agree. Its sheer injustice with the potential candidates.
Thats totally my opinion. No offence intended