Quote:
Originally Posted by jbird
Very Valid Point. In reality obscurity in terms of Time and Assortment of Panel is frustrating for any candidate. Besides these are scores. other tests like Military or CAT MATS type do tell. Often, they have interview too. its mere the so called clandestine monkeying as you said my friend. We all know, nobody will point out the benefit he gets out this concealing. We will be more virtuous if we know facts. Real Facts. Besides if they disclose them whose going to dread the illustrious consort of panels and unfaltering pillars of Justice and fair play.
Very good opinion. But tell me one good reason, Has ever quality of competition eroded when people know from where to compensate. Students trying to compensate their weak point if make low mark in one portion and high at other.If a css candidate know his weakness of written or interview whats wrong in it. Besides, concept of luck does not remain that forceful to believe in then. Overconfidence or under-confidence on the basis of written is palatable reason but nobody is going to spoil everything if he know what it counts for.
We cant eliminate the point raised by Zuhaib sab that if anyone does monkey and favorites anyone ; who'll know? probably they notify it on FPSC website in bold....  |
This may be true in some cases but if we see the this things as a whole then majority of the candidates will fail to gain the lost confidence due to shortage of marks. Because unlike very few elite schools have the psychologists from the class 1 and they train the students and improve their personality and in CSS majority of the candidates come from the background in which they have minimum financial resources and complexed family structure. All these things contribute to their mental aptitude.
But your other point of playing unfair game is valid. The rejection letter must be issued stating the reason for not falling into the selection criteria so that in the next attempt the candidate can improve that side.