Quote:
Originally Posted by pureapak
I welcome your opinion for a little correction.
1.
I am 25 and meet the whole eligibility criteria laid down by SPSC for CCE.
its quite confusing how you smelled frustration from my words ?
what i spoke was baked by sound arguments. You were also supposed to come up with a reasonable viewpoint and affordable evaluation.
2.
Luck is the best excuse to save embarrassment. It is a milestone in the process of theoretic motivation. Let's not lose a common sense in deep abstract conjectures.
3. In a broader perspective, with a realistic outlook, there is no good in 15 years HEAVY DUTY age relaxation policy. if you think there is any.. i would love to know what and how of it?
4. It would be highly appreciated if you withstand the feedback maturely, take no offense ,use sober words and spare us silly insinuations.
Thanks
|
First of all You do not have right to make any amendment in my opinion.
Your previous post arguments:
1. Do you call your misconception and fear
a logical argument to oppose age relaxation? This is baseless argument which does not hold any credit as there are thousands of applicants which do not have any political affiliation for support. Age relaxation is granted to the candidate to compensate the duration from late 90s till end of dictator rule during there was ban on Jobs. It was granted on strong public demand protests if you remember. It is granted irrespective or party affiliation to all the people so your argument does not hold any weight-age i guess.
2. How can you call over age persons so called deserving? Do you have your self made criteria to check the real deserving candidates and so called deserving candidates? I think this is the function of SPSC, let them do their job.
No large scale switching is possible in my opinion because mostly fresh people are hired along with some experienced people with good practical background.
3. In light of argument mentioned in clause 1, the case against the age relaxation in sindh will be weaker because of the continuous ban on jobs have deprived thousands of the people which have eventually become over-age. If SPSC does not allow them to contest PCS-2013 this will be against the fundamental rights of these people as this practise can be called as discriminatory. (Its as per my understanding, any one can differ)
4. Again a simple argument that SPSC has more workload. Don't you think that by inviting applications manually they themselves are inviting work load for themselves
. Let me tell you inside story that they welcome such work load so that they can get TA/DAs for extra work on week days and late sittings.
5. Agreed to final comment
Though you took my comments on the other way, I was not arguing your arguments i was just pointing out the useless exchange of words between you and one other member at the forum, but you didn't took it maturely and now indirectly you were hitting me.