Originally Posted by AAawan

yes i think, I have presented only one side of the coin ( the bad one) and I thought that limitations on free speech is to prove. In each paragraph I was able to prove that free speech has posed only hurts to the world. But you have pointed out the thing that was of crucial importance, that one should give the examples of both sides ( fruits of free speech and perils of F.speech),,,,, and in conclusion one should prove that above examples suggest that free speech without limitations has produced more harm than peace!!!!!!