View Single Post
  #6  
Old Thursday, September 13, 2007
secondopinion02's Avatar
secondopinion02 secondopinion02 is offline
38th CTP (PAAS)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2009 - Merit 531
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Karachi
Posts: 218
Thanks: 14
Thanked 149 Times in 64 Posts
secondopinion02 will become famous soon enough
Default @Waseem Gurmani

Quote:
nice attempt indeed but
"Amar Bil-Maroof Wanahi-o- Mankar"
consult it again and see what it lacks....


"these are binding upon at least to voice their concern as a Muslim who cannot tolerate evils of gross injustices going on women"
GOING ON WOMEN???? doesnt it seem different


i think it will be suitable to throw some light on judiciary particulary in the case of Swara and Vaani and also discussing role of iftakhar chaudhary (mentioning role of independent judiciary in 2007)

u must be appreciated for this nice piece of work
Dear Gurmani,

Come to your argument:
Quote:
"they are binding upon at least to voice their concern as a Muslim who cannot tolerate evils of gross injustices going on women"
GOING ON WOMEN???? doesnt it seem different
By saying "they are binding upon"; it means the principles of "Amar Bil-Maroof Wanahi-o- Mankar" are binding upon every Muslim.

By saying "at least to voice their concern as a Muslim who cannot tolerate evils of .....": it means the lowest possibility to following those principles are to "raise one's voice or speak them as crimes"

By saying "gross injustices going on women" I did not mean that our Judiciary is doing injustices on women. It means that cutoms like Vaani, Swara, Karo-Kari and many others followed by people are "gross injustices going on women". How come it be different? don't you read daily in the newspaper that a woman was killed under karo-kari; or a girl pledged as Vaani or Swara?


As far as mentioning the role of CJ and Judiciary positively; read the following part of the essay:

"....Many girls given under Vaani or Swara to the aggrieved family refused to marry there after attaining adult age. CJ of the Supreme Court of Pakistan have taken suo motu action in this regard. Furthermore, girls as young as ten years of age are married with 60 years old man under such customs......"

I haven't discussed the role of CJ in detail; however you are right these can be elaborated.
Please, rectify the sentence as given below; this sentence had left my proofreading review:

"they these are binding upon us at least to voice their our concern as Muslims who cannot tolerate evils of gross injustices going on women"

Thanks for your valuable comments


__________________
Lo! man is in a state of loss. (Al-Asr:103:2) And every small and great thing is recorded. (Al-Qamar:54:53) And guard yourselves against a day in which ye will be brought back to Allah. Then every soul will be paid in full that which it hath earned, and they will not be wronged. (Al-Baqara:2:281)

Last edited by Shooting Star; Sunday, April 22, 2012 at 05:05 PM.
Reply With Quote