Quote:
Originally Posted by ARISTOCRAT
The problem in open handed questions is, examiners objectivity is not up to the mark. Examiners took even papers with them to home, check there, though this practice is not allowed. So a big question mark on the objectivity asa well as credibility of respected examiners. I have experienced such things in my own , have seen this . So ....
There are flaws in our entire system , a person who passed in all 11 subjects, got failed in islamiat in 2014, other then islamiat , he had an aggregate of 710.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
yes, there are flaws in almost every sector of our country but FPSC is known for its merit based recruitment.
and as far as the "
taking copies to home for checking" is concerned, I don't think its true. Many of our seniors who had internal sources in FPSC told us that this checking is done under heavy surveillance and is done at FPSC Head Office and not at home.
Though, I would disagree with their policy of torturing subjects to filter the number of candidates, but by all means it is the best we have got in our flawed system.
The regrouping of subjects and change of syllabus at their part is another attempt to reduce and filter the number of candidates but it will prove beneficial for the candidates in the long run as I hope it will put a stop to the torture policy of FPSC.
My attempts are gone and CE-15 was my last. I wish and pray that this new policy proves fruitful for coming aspirants.
Failure of candidates in Islamiat in CE-14 is also an example of torture policy of FPSC. One of my colleagues who qualified CE-12 failed in CE-14 in Islamiat despite the fact that he had better knowledge and arguments regarding the subject then any of our other colleagues, but yet he failed.
This shows incompetency at the part of FPSC but trust me it is yet better than other recruitment commissions in our country.
JazakAllah