Quote:
Originally Posted by lovereflector
Fpsc is credible in term of reputation, but in Pakistan there is always opulent like respected Dr. Arslan Iftikhar, which finds back-door entry in bureaucratic setup. I don't think chairman or any single individual can be shield against nepotism or corruption.Furthermore, for the chairmanship of fpsc they should consider a bureaucrat not army personals, I think chairman should be the one who passes the same system like any ordinary csp. Whereas, these army personals enter into bureaucracy through Zia's paved way.
|
I would respectfully disagree. I think most of the bureaucrats are corrupt to the bone by the end of their careers. Army generals may not be an exception, but at least they have lesser political leanings. Bureaucrats can be easily influenced by politicians whereas this is not true about the army personnel. And that makes the latter suited more for this particular job.