Originally Posted by gintino

It was highly skewed. There were a total of 11 heads in the syllabus. Out of those 11 heads, the examiner made the entire subjective exam from only 2 heads - 5 questions from one topic and 2 from another.

Secondly, one of the questions regarding governance was out of course. I am sure the examiner (assuming that he is the paper-setter) wasn't the guy who set the new syllabus. The paper setter seemed to be a public policy guy, who was asked to make the paper at the eleventh hour. Obviously, he didn't see the syllabus.

PS: You do not need Master's education to qualify this exam.