just like poor organisational structure of BPSC, it has not deviated from its natural inefficiency this time as well.I wonder how could the members alongwith its chairman be recruited when they did not have the basic idea of a competitive exam.The worst example is its General Knowledge & everyday science paper.BPSC claim to have 20% of pure science related question in its everyday science paper but look at this.It was more than 50 % & most of the questions were irrelevant.Besides,it was prepared by The Chairman of BPSC.And most ironically, the chairman would be able to answer the questions he produced in his paper.come to Islamic history and there u would find solid marking objective question asking abt the inventers of the water dial or sun clock.Now come on,it was an egyptian civilization stuff some 4000 years ago and what in GOD,s hell it had got to do with Islamic history.It further asked abt Islamic fraternity,regulator of life & Islamic teachings of equality in the Islamic history.Now one would laugh out load when he comes to know that the examiner does not have the common sense to differentiate b/w Islamiat & Islamic History.