Thursday, July 07, 2022
08:44 AM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > Beginner's Guide > CSS Competitive Examination

CSS Competitive Examination The Central Superior Services Examination is conducted every year for induction to Group 17 of the Civil Services

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2018
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 9
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Long Live Pakistan is on a distinguished road
Exclamation CE-2017 Allocation Query

CE-2017 ALLOCATION ISSUE

So I have been following different threads on various platforms about the allocations of CE-2017 candidates but still am unable to find any satisfactory justification.
The fact that the non-recommended candidates are not the ones with lower merits, rather appear randomly in the final result is difficult to understand
The people who are justifying by saying that it is because of Punjab quota being fulfilled. Please answer how Merit no.126, a Male Candidate from Punjab did not get allocated to any group, and another male candidate from Punjab bearing Merit no. 130 got allocated? There are various examples like this. and for every province.
Those who are saying that it may be because of character verification issues e.t.c. They are requested to read Note 3 (ii) at the end of the final result.
which means that even the recommended candidates have to go through character verification after this.

So is there any logical explanation regarding this issue?
That why around 50 candidates are not recommended for service regardless of seats being available. and why are they selected at random? What are the basis of them being not recommended?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2018
zaindy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Karachi
Posts: 245
Thanks: 35
Thanked 77 Times in 54 Posts
zaindy is on a distinguished road
Default

It is just conjecture but maybe some of those who were not allocated are already serving CSPs or PCS officers and did not get high enough merit to be able to change their service group to their preference. Some others may have been not recommended due to psychological reasons.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2018
usman khalid's Avatar
40th CTP (DMG)
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason: CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2011 - Merit 22Elite CSP Medal: Members who previously received (CSP Award  and Member of the Year Award ) OR (CSP award + Gold Medal + Medal of Appreciation) are eligible for this award. - Issue reason: Member of the Year: Awarded to those community members who have made invaluable contributions to the Community in the particular year - Issue reason: 2012
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Khairpur, Sindh
Posts: 1,256
Thanks: 1,131
Thanked 2,147 Times in 983 Posts
usman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant futureusman khalid has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Long Live Pakistan View Post
CE-2017 ALLOCATION ISSUE

So I have been following different threads on various platforms about the allocations of CE-2017 candidates but still am unable to find any satisfactory justification.
The fact that the non-recommended candidates are not the ones with lower merits, rather appear randomly in the final result is difficult to understand
The people who are justifying by saying that it is because of Punjab quota being fulfilled. Please answer how Merit no.126, a Male Candidate from Punjab did not get allocated to any group, and another male candidate from Punjab bearing Merit no. 130 got allocated? There are various examples like this. and for every province.
Those who are saying that it may be because of character verification issues e.t.c. They are requested to read Note 3 (ii) at the end of the final result.
which means that even the recommended candidates have to go through character verification after this.

So is there any logical explanation regarding this issue?
That why around 50 candidates are not recommended for service regardless of seats being available. and why are they selected at random? What are the basis of them being not recommended?
Suppose a candidate selects only five preferences for occupational groups/services (say PAS, PSP, FSP, PAAS and IRS). Suppose his merit No. is 90 and the last candidate to be allocated to any of his four preferred choices is at merit no. 85. Then he will not be allocated irrespective of availability of seats for other groups/services. Similarly candidates repeating to improve/change group/service usually do not select all preferences. Therefore, the seats might remain vacant in case they are unable to get allocated to their desired groups.
__________________
Best end of life is not knowledge but action.
Don't limit yourself to what you think people are expecting!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Sunday, July 01, 2018
Shahidhailian's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Lahore
Posts: 432
Thanks: 90
Thanked 165 Times in 119 Posts
Shahidhailian is on a distinguished road
Default

that means if you want bureaucracy in any occupational group enlist all groups in the form so as to keep yourself at safe side
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
allocation, groups, issue, not recommended, recommended

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Advertisement No. 06 & 07 /2017 (Lecturers, Subject Specialists and TMO's) Asif Khan Shinwari KPK PSC Others Examinations 0 Saturday, August 12, 2017 02:31 PM
Various posts announced by kpk psc... nafees khattak KPKPMS 8 Thursday, July 13, 2017 08:07 PM
Advertisement No. 02/2017 Asif Khan Shinwari KPK PSC Others Examinations 3 Saturday, March 25, 2017 10:18 AM
KPK PSC Announced a Lot of jobs Qacc KPK PSC Others Examinations 13 Saturday, October 20, 2012 03:06 PM
KPK PSC: Adv. No.03 / 2011, Due Date: 23-07-2011 prestigious KPKPMS 4 Wednesday, October 12, 2011 12:12 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.