Regarding age issue is serious debate because nature of employment, life burdens and so on varies from.area to area and people to people. Therefore age must be extended.

Similarly If a civil servants are getting age relax till 32 years then they must give age relax to everyone atleast till 32 years.

The real problem currently Pak is facing is that when all his tenure a bureacrat reaches as Secretary, he hardly stays their for more than 1 or 1.5 years. So it means that what he learnt and have in exp in more than 25 years service, he could not give back to system. Apply similar situation on Pak army and COAS then understand it with army chiefs keeps on changing with every 1 year or less. With this regulation army becam flop instittuin. So there must be good solution available to State to solve its major institutional problem.

I personally think with current wave of higher education where every district got one public sector uni, the system or css reform must have min qualification to MPhil 18 or PhD . And higher aspirants directly in BPS-18 or 19 directly. So that they give to system properly. Similar sort of discussion i had with bureacrate last month. He said est division is also thinking about it.

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

What are your thoughts about the css reforms / what type of reforms would you like to see or would have proposed if you were among the decision-makers? Or are you satisfied with the way things are i.e. The status quo

P.s. Everyone is welcome to reply and share their thoughts on css reforms here

Just like the respected member above this post has written that M.Phil or Phd requirement can be made a pre-requisite for being eligible for css
I think this path should gave been adopted under the much "hyped" "CSS REFORMS" but at the same time, many people will not be happy if 18-year education or an even higher education becomes mandatory, so that also needs to be considered.

Regards

The least that can be done in this regard is spreading the word on social media channels and registering complaint on PM citizen portal. All interested aspirants must lodge a complaint on the portal to at least make the issue heard and noticed. There can be a lot of debate on nitty gritty but at the moment, increase in upper age limit is the most common concern that must be addressed.

The discussion must start from the point what states want; not want aspirants want or desire so ...



Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk

Not every one is in the same boat bro. I have struggled with multiple mental ailments all my life and I barely managed to complete my bachelors and Masters recently. I have touched 30 and have never gone for a job or a CSS attempt for that matter. After 5 years of medicine and psychotherapy, I have recovered very recently.
I know I'm being very selfish and I don't know how I would have felt if I were 24 years old and people were requesting for an age extension. But nevertheless I desperately yearn for a CSS attempt. I most probably won't be able to ace this exam but I still don't want to have any regrets. It would mean the world to me if an age relaxation is offered for the 2022 attempt.

Aspirants below the age of 30 will surely not like the idea of an age extension bro. What we need is a concerted effort. I suggest we make a Facebook group and comprehend how much support can we garner in the first place. Unless we have the numbers to convince these social media channels, we won't be going anywhere with our request. Once we have like 500-1000 members in the group, then we can start sending letters to dawn and to pages like Parhlo and Mangobaz to build some steam. Furthermore we can follow that up with the citizen Portal. What do you think?

That's the spirit brother. Nasrum min Allah e waa fatahun qareeb... see you there

Aoa
Sir, are you also backing / supporting the need to increase the number of attempts as well?
Regards

Yes we can do that too. No issues at all.