Geography or Urdu : which one is high scoring ?
 

which one of these is high scoring subject?
GEOGRAPHY or URDU
waiting for reply
regards

my suggestion is that?
 

If you prepare well and give time to subject then geography is better then urdu otherwise urdu if you have not much time for prepartion.

[QUOTE=Rajai;170914]which one of these is high scoring subject?
GEOGRAPHY or URDU
waiting for reply
regards[/QUOTE]

Go for Geography. Easy to prepare and attempt........high marks guaranteed.

cheers,
floydian

geography..

Most of the times Geography is more scoring than Urdu

[QUOTE=Rajai;170914]which one of these is high scoring subject?
GEOGRAPHY or URDU
waiting for reply
regards[/QUOTE]

GEOGRAPHY. its too much time n effort seeking but reward u at the end...
regards

[QUOTE=Tabassum Shabbir Awan;171077]Most of the times Geography is more scoring than Urdu[/QUOTE]

i don't knw why people say this about urdu... is it low scoring in css? or u people say as a whole?

[QUOTE=jiashah;171204]i don't knw why people say this about urdu... is it low scoring in css? or u people say as a whole?[/QUOTE]

Well it is a general view that Geo being a bit technical gives u a better score than does urdu. While it holds true in general but exceptions are always there nd a person with a taste fr urdu literature nd exceptional prep might score even better than Geo. I know ppl who have score above 140 in urdu but they happen to be few.

So if u think u can do good in Urdu coz u have the talent for tht then go ahead. Dere z no harm in it.

@s ranjha

thanks... i thought that even with preparation, we can't get high scores... it 'hv been a very high scoring subject throughout my academic career. so i opted it. thanks for ur clearance

Following information is extracted from CSS Annual Report 2008 and it shows Geography gives better scores than Urdu.

[B][U]Geography[/U][/B]
Appeared : 368
[B]Written Qualified [/B]
33% - 59% marks : 253 (ratio 69%)
60% & above marks : 51 (ratio 14%)

[B][U]Urdu[/U][/B]
Appeared : 675
[B]Written Qualified [/B]
33% - 59% : 474 (ratio 70%)
60% & above : 7 (ratio 1%)

[U][B]REASONS:[/B][/U]

[U][B]Geography-I:[/B][/U] Overall performance was good. Candidates who
studied subject thoroughly have performed very well and got good marks in
objective question. However, candidates who had not studied subject waste their time in writing irrelevant material. They should give answers to the point with well illustrated diagrams for better performance.

[U][B]Geography-II:[/B][/U] Overall performance of candidates was very low.
Barring a few candidates, almost all candidates failed to understand demand of questions, particularly Q.No.1, 2, 6 and 7(b). As a result, their answers were way-ward and mostly gibberish. Some of them seemed to possess a fair amount of information but their knowledge appeared to be sketchy and answers fragmentary. Candidates showed poor expression and inarticulate language in their answers.

[U][B]Urdu-I:[/B][/U] Standard of answers simply deplorable. Majority of candidates
have dependent upon ready made notes/guides and tried to memorize
available material for qualifying examination. Candidates could not produce
answers as per requirement of questions. They filled pages with unwanted
information and irrelevant material which had no link with questions. For
discouraging the bulk use of guides/ready made notes, new questions should be formulated instead of repeating old wording/voice of question year by year.

[U][B]Urdu-II:[/B][/U] Despite better performance of candidates, it was generally
observed that stock answers were available in market in form of guide books or short notes. Taste of appreciating poetry was on the decay.