Thursday, April 18, 2024
03:50 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Compulsory Subjects > Current Affairs

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Thursday, July 17, 2008
javediqbalmalik790's Avatar
Member
Qualifier: Awarded to those Members who cleared css written examination - Issue reason: CE 2012- Roll No  9975
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Multan
Posts: 37
Thanks: 20
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
javediqbalmalik790 is on a distinguished road
Arrow NATO forces in FATA

NATO FORCES IN FATA, FOREIGN POLICY AND PEOPLES OF PAKISTAN

The seemingly interesting paradox Pakistan is facing at moment in form of Afghan allegations and American militancy despite their heavy dependence that they are threatening Pakistan, though looking new but in reality is a step of Non-Muslim specially Indo-US conspiracy to demolish The Fort of Islam from the face of earth in context of destroying the whole Muslim Uma, inherent since the creation of Pakistan.
The enmity of India for Pakistan is above-board and a never lasting debate can be made in this context. After the support of Pakistan for Afghanistan in innumerable issues including shelter for more than 8 Million refugees, partnership in Trade, support in education and health and much more, its response should be ignominious for itself.
US realizing the significance of Pakistan fraudulently made alliance and after covenants of SEATO in 1954 and CENTO in 1955, Pakistan became a very important member of US cold war to emerge as a super power. Pakistan played very vital role starting in 1979 in Soviet Union disintegration and gifting US with super-power tiara in 1990. After it, US displayed naked aggression against all emerging Muslim countries in collaboration with Pakistan. Is it turning on to Pakistan now?
NATO forces besieging FATA damn depict specter of war against so-called terrorism, rather are display of US militarism and requisition. The scapegoat militia for terrorism even if rendered true, what is it? The terse answer to this havoc sounds too glib that they are the same used against USSR. Were they soldiers when it came to US beneficiary and now they are militants? Mr. Bush and Mr. Karzai say that from FATA are coming militants: these are the areas of training when USSR mission was underway. Then they were friends and now they are Terrorists? Above all US condemns any interference in its internal affairs so who has rendered it right to poke into our matters? The strategic policies of US at moment gestured from white house are sufficient to aggravate turmoil in country; aren’t they? To me this peril is sufficient to review our foreign policy; isn’t it Mr. Zardari and co? Mr. Bush! Should we depart from American block? Muslim Uma! Hasn’t Islamic world become indispensable? Coalition Government! Can’t u even unite for the integrity of country?COAS! Can’t we revitalize our forces and forestall our Army? Mr. President! Why can't u speak in hiked confident tone of Mahmood Ahmadi even being president of a Nuclear power state? Aren’t the FATA locals better forestalling and preparing 30 lac people for fighting on with out any trepidation?Mr.PM! You need to be brave as His Highness, Mr. Bush, has called upon you for talks in amnesty of peace that is USA. Are you ready? You may concern Mr.Zardari. Yet time is left. Isn’t? US congress! Has US utilized Pakistan to its fill? Does it deem that it is time to acquire control over rich resources of Central Asia and establish monarchy in this region of vital accent? In the end are we a nation or not? If being a nation is restricted to state of 8 October or 6 September, then situation is no more anew. It is indispensable to strengthen ourselves at all levels and respond bravely and united to this critical scenario. Many queries are left unrevealed to the responsible men-in-power waiting for their kind apprehension.
May Allah help us all...Amin!!

Javed Iqbal
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to javediqbalmalik790 For This Useful Post:
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oppose Military aggression by counter-aggression NATO vs. CSTO lmno250 News & Articles 0 Sunday, February 15, 2009 01:37 AM
World War II Naseer Ahmed Chandio European History 0 Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:15 AM
War On Iraq sibgakhan Current Affairs 22 Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:33 AM
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Muhammad Adnan General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 0 Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:36 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.