#1
|
||||
|
||||
NATO forces in FATA
NATO FORCES IN FATA, FOREIGN POLICY AND PEOPLES OF PAKISTAN
The seemingly interesting paradox Pakistan is facing at moment in form of Afghan allegations and American militancy despite their heavy dependence that they are threatening Pakistan, though looking new but in reality is a step of Non-Muslim specially Indo-US conspiracy to demolish The Fort of Islam from the face of earth in context of destroying the whole Muslim Uma, inherent since the creation of Pakistan. The enmity of India for Pakistan is above-board and a never lasting debate can be made in this context. After the support of Pakistan for Afghanistan in innumerable issues including shelter for more than 8 Million refugees, partnership in Trade, support in education and health and much more, its response should be ignominious for itself. US realizing the significance of Pakistan fraudulently made alliance and after covenants of SEATO in 1954 and CENTO in 1955, Pakistan became a very important member of US cold war to emerge as a super power. Pakistan played very vital role starting in 1979 in Soviet Union disintegration and gifting US with super-power tiara in 1990. After it, US displayed naked aggression against all emerging Muslim countries in collaboration with Pakistan. Is it turning on to Pakistan now? NATO forces besieging FATA damn depict specter of war against so-called terrorism, rather are display of US militarism and requisition. The scapegoat militia for terrorism even if rendered true, what is it? The terse answer to this havoc sounds too glib that they are the same used against USSR. Were they soldiers when it came to US beneficiary and now they are militants? Mr. Bush and Mr. Karzai say that from FATA are coming militants: these are the areas of training when USSR mission was underway. Then they were friends and now they are Terrorists? Above all US condemns any interference in its internal affairs so who has rendered it right to poke into our matters? The strategic policies of US at moment gestured from white house are sufficient to aggravate turmoil in country; aren’t they? To me this peril is sufficient to review our foreign policy; isn’t it Mr. Zardari and co? Mr. Bush! Should we depart from American block? Muslim Uma! Hasn’t Islamic world become indispensable? Coalition Government! Can’t u even unite for the integrity of country?COAS! Can’t we revitalize our forces and forestall our Army? Mr. President! Why can't u speak in hiked confident tone of Mahmood Ahmadi even being president of a Nuclear power state? Aren’t the FATA locals better forestalling and preparing 30 lac people for fighting on with out any trepidation?Mr.PM! You need to be brave as His Highness, Mr. Bush, has called upon you for talks in amnesty of peace that is USA. Are you ready? You may concern Mr.Zardari. Yet time is left. Isn’t? US congress! Has US utilized Pakistan to its fill? Does it deem that it is time to acquire control over rich resources of Central Asia and establish monarchy in this region of vital accent? In the end are we a nation or not? If being a nation is restricted to state of 8 October or 6 September, then situation is no more anew. It is indispensable to strengthen ourselves at all levels and respond bravely and united to this critical scenario. Many queries are left unrevealed to the responsible men-in-power waiting for their kind apprehension. May Allah help us all...Amin!! Javed Iqbal |
The Following User Says Thank You to javediqbalmalik790 For This Useful Post: | ||
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Oppose Military aggression by counter-aggression NATO vs. CSTO | lmno250 | News & Articles | 0 | Sunday, February 15, 2009 01:37 AM |
World War II | Naseer Ahmed Chandio | European History | 0 | Tuesday, December 12, 2006 10:15 AM |
War On Iraq | sibgakhan | Current Affairs | 22 | Wednesday, January 18, 2006 11:33 AM |
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) | Muhammad Adnan | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 0 | Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:36 PM |