Complete css current affairs paper ce 2021 resolved

[soft rock]

CSS CURRENT AFFAIRS 2021 PAPER

Part-II

Q.No.2. What will be the strategic and political implications of the US withdrawal from the Open Skies Treaty, and how is it impacting the arms control arrangements between the great powers?

Q.No.3. What are the similarities and differences between Nagorno-Karabakh and Kashmir conflicts?

Q.No.4. Last two decades have seen the rise of the right as a potent challenge to the liberal democracies throughout the world. What are the causes of this rise and how can states attend this challenge?

Q.No.5. Most of the major political parties have committed to the creation of new provinces in Pakistan. Should new provinces be created or not, in Pakistan? Elaborate your answer by giving references from the new province debate.

Q.No.6. Some scholars term Afghan Peace Deal as the US Withdrawl Deal. Do you agree. Answer the question while discussing the contours of the Afghan Peace Process.

Q.No.7. How is the militarization of Artificial intelligence and computing revolutionizing the military affairs?

Q.No.8. Delineate the ways in which Covid-19 has affected the contours of the contemporary world order.

[soft rock]

Q.No.2. What will be the strategic and political implications of the US withdrawal from the Open Skies Treaty, and how is it impacting the arms control arrangements between the great powers?


Ans:

A.
IMPLICATIONS OF THE US WITHDRAWAL FROM THE "Open Skies Treaty"

US withdrawal from the open skies treaty has both positive and negative implications over the various states. Dofferent members of the Open Skies Teaty entertain different strategic and political implications.

A.i.
STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

1- US been the main character in the Open Skies Treaty removed its role from the transparency of world order with this withdrawal of the US. Critics are divided over the intended point. Some favor the US withdrawal from the Open Skies Treaty, while others oppose it.

2. US withdrawal from the Open Skies Treaty left the great powers with a bigger margin to work for the global peace. Who have to meet a greater responsibility. And these competent powers can easily meet this challenge.

3. This withdrawal of US is inclination of the US and its arms forces to hard power supremacy in the world. Which discloses the new chapters of sorrows and loss because of the less responsible US.

A.ii.
POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS

1. World peace organizations observe the contour of the US hard supremacy (after withdrawal of the US from the Open Skies Treaty) less supported by the great powers. As such great powers favor political solutions for global peace problem as compared to the arms brutality.

2. US having strong hold in the United Nations enjoys favor of the United Nations in the political affairs. And this is limiting the sovereignty of other independent great power, who are not yet super powers - counter equalize the pride of US.

3. US hard supremacy has altered the political jurisdictions of weak states across the world especially the muslim developing countries, who are yet submissive to most of the US demands and US bans.

B.
IMPACTS OF THE DISCUSSED IMPLICATIONS ON THE ARMS CONTROL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE GREAT POWERS

1. The intended US withdrawal has impacted the great powers arms control agreements to the limit of downsizing the image of these great powers. US supremacy is ruled over more than favoring any other state out of the great powers by the world's peace organizations. And because of that unjust reality the world order and arms control agreements of the great powers are less effective.

2. Arms control agreements between the great powers has to adopt modern multi-pronged policy rules. Which could soften the harder supremacy of the US to transform it's high headed role into its contribution for the global peace across the world.

[soft rock]

Q.No.3. What are the similarities and differences between Nagorno-Karabakh and Kashmir conflicts?

Ans:

A.
SIMILARITIES BETWEEN NAGORNO-KARABAKH & KASHMIR CONFLICT

1. Both these conflicts of Nargorno-Karabakh & Kashmir used to be the struggles for freedom, rights, and peaceful environment with established law & order situations there in.

2. Both the conflicts observed the loss of public life, lack of outside contributions towards the resolution of these two conflicts, and consistent brutal treatment of the offenders against the innocent victims.

3. Conflicts use naturally to be between any, mostly two, right and wrong groups. Similar was the case of these two conflicts. As, the warriors of these both conflicts operated vital campaigns, which caught the eye of media - bothwhere.

4. Bothwhere, daily life of the public was badly affected. Contention between the opposing forces, there in, used to be the lifestyle of mortal public. Where even the survivors sustained poisonous hope for freedom, rights, and peace.

B.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN NAGORNO-KARABAKH & KASHMIR CONFLICT

1. Over the years Kashmir conflict has seen the chapters of history. While the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was contention of limited time.

2. The sacrifice of public life which the Kashmir conflict observed is uncountable. While compared to this massacre over the Kashmir conflict, the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict was not subject to such an un-imaginary genocide.

3. Nagorno-Karabagh conflict was successful as compared to Kashmir conflict. The former quitted soon, and gave lessons of struggle for freedom to the world - especially to the Occupied Kashmir and Palestine.

4. Nagorno-Karabakh is heading towards daily social just order. While Occupied Kashmir has yet to stuff history with the chapters of more wastage of time, blood loss, and waste of human dignity along with the loss of other assets.

[soft rock]

Q.No.4. Last two decades have seen the rise of the right as a potent challenge to the liberal democracies throughout the world. What are the causes of this rise and how can states attend this challenge?


Ans:

CAUSES OF THE RISE OF THE RIGHT AS A POTENT CHALLENGE FOR LIBERAL DEMOCRACIES

1. Discrimination across the states between the rich and poor, upper class people and lower class people, favour for those who have political allies, and misuse of the man-power. All contribute to make the rise of the right as a potent challenge for the liberal democracies.

2. Easy access to government services by the stronger people, unfair dealing with public by the institutions, peaceless society, lack of law and order in societies, and lack of integration and coordination across the states render the rise of the right as a potent challenge for the liberal democracies.

3. Imposition of taxes, inflation, unjust job distribution among the public by the states, unemployment, profused awareness among masses, and surrounding public with problems, (which is the old legacy of weak governence), cause the rise of the right as a potent challenge for the liberal democracies.

4. Social integration and public gatherings is additional cause giving birth and support to the uprising among public for their rights. Here media also serves as a back-up factor for the uprising of the masses for their rights, which I like the most.

SUGGESTIONS FOR STATES TO ATTEND THE (POTENT) CHALLENGE OF THE RISE OF THE RIGHT

1. Making each citizen capable to have easy access to each government service. This will minimize the.uprisings - along with makiing the institutions reliable for the.citizens, archieving their rights fully.

2. Supporting the awareness among the citizens of a state removes the doubt of facilitating the public with a healthy contour of public rights.

3. Minimizing monetary burden for the citizens by the governments will kill the despair among masses about their rights. Where the citizens can be best served with this tactic by minizing the taxes on them, giving subsidy on food items, and increasing monthly salaries of the servants, etc ettc.

4. If the discrimination is rooted out from the societies, then nothing can stop governments in building healthy trust with the voting public. As this step ensures equality and the provision of public rights on the basis of significance of each individual.

[soft rock]

Q.No.5. Most of the major political parties have committed to the creation of new provinces in Pakistan. Should new provinces be created or not, in Pakistan? Elaborate your answer by giving references from the new province debate.[

Ans.

Full exercise of rights and responsibilities needs freedom. However, the creation of new provinces in Pakistan is a different chapter and needs analysis of different points to understand whether the new provinces should be created or not - in this country.

Point 1. The regions of the hopeful provinces where their creation is under debate avail limited amount of assets (in the four province structure of Pakistan) annually to meet their needs. However, after the creation of new provinces, these newly created provinces will have their own annual budget - as per the new province debate. But in contrast, this creation will create burden for the national treasure, as the national budget of the federal government of Pakistan itself is backed up by foreign bailouts. For which the solution is easy, that the areas of the expected provinces should develop and make the wise use of their homegrown resources to meet the economic needs of their public. Hence because of this reality of the homegrown resources, the creation of new provinces seems inevitable in Pakistan. And may be right as well.

Point 2. Public awareness, the role of media supporting sensationalists - causing the public uprising - public who later on turn out to be real patriots, public who are believing in perfect citizenship, hopefull for their rights and aim fulfilling their responsibilities for the state. All these facts support the motive, of the concerned public, for the creation of new provinces. This point , as per the new province debate, easily make us conclude that the creation of new provinces will be perfect for the concerned people there in.

Point 3. Justice on daily basis will be available over the door-steps. Where unjust social environment will be made just for the public. Public will be less rebel. As, daily access to public insitutions will be ensured. And the concerned public will easily entertain the justice of different institutions.

This point also support the supposition that if the new provinces are created in Pakistan. It will add success and prosperity to the public life there inside the new provinces- as per the new province debate. Which is the really needed destination in each country across the world, not just Pakistan.

Point4. Autonomy entertained by the provinces anywhere in the world promotes peace, progress, harmony, and social fairness. The creation of new provinces in Pakistan seems to face the same fate also, changing the current stereotype of the these regions, where despair is commonplace , and securing a more happy life for the public there in - as per the new province debate.

Point5. The political parties giving hopes to the regions of the new provinces must be valid. This story should not be limited only till the success of political campaigns and voting contests. This given hope should work beyond taking the hold of governance by the political parties. As, productivity of the whole Pakistan, same like depending on federation, also depends on the growth of the provinces. So, the more the growth in the province, the more will be the national prosperity. Hence, creating the new provinces is not a bad idea in Pakistan- as per the new province debate.

[soft rock]

Q.No.6. Some scholars term Afghan Peace Deal as the US Withdrawl Deal. Do you agree. Answer the question while discussing the contours of the Afghan Peace Process.

Ans:

IS THE AFGHAN PEACE DEAL IS THE US WITHDRAWAL DEAL??? THE CONTOURS OF THE AFGHAN PEACE DEAL

1. Afghan Peace Deal is sparing the US inside Afghanistan. Peace in Afghanistan and peace in the surrounding regions has been the obvious motive of the US war on terror in Afghanistan. Where the second manifesto of the US strategic politics in Afghanistan was to minimize the extremism of the afghan talibans while maintaining it's supremacy in the region. However, now the US can no more afford the war on terror and peace concerns in Afghanistan. So Afghan Peace Deal as per the monetary burden on the US economy, is boosting the goal of the US withdrawal from Afghanistan.

2. Internationally, despite the fact that US is the only Super Power of the world, the reputation of the US strategic politics is degrading on the international front because of the shifting policies of the US towards Afghanistan from time to time. And the unyielding consistent struggle of the US against the war on terror is no more giving room to US in Afghanistan. Hence from this perspective, because of the realization of Afghan Peace Deal, US is seeking withdrawal of its forces from Afghanistan.

3. More than focusing on the international affairs, the US needs to focus on it's domestic affairs. Where the US economy is crippling, US public is in despair, US social conditions are pathetic, social in the US is prevalant, and rights of the public of the US are not easily entertained there in. All this scenario is rendering the Afghan Peace Deal as an excuse for the withdrawal of US forces from Afghanistan.

4. International pressure on the US government over it's excessive use of hard power in Afghanistan, delivered finally the Afghan Peace Deal. This peace deal is giving hope of peace and fairness around the world to the global peace organizations while the US smoothly want to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan.

5. US involvement in Afghanistan was neither observed by the western world nor the islamic world as an instance of clash of western and islamic civilizations. It was a useless struggle for power and supremacy between the extremists of muslim afghanistan and Super Power USA. At last this struggle came to an exhausted end and Afghan Peace Deal spared the withdrawing US from Afghanistan.

Five times, as discussed above, the Afghan Peace Deal is the US Withdrawal Deal from Afghanistan. Each of the above five discussed contours of the Afghan Peace Deal supported the said statement in the given question.

[soft rock]

Q.No.7. How is the militarization of Artificial intelligence and computing revolutionizing the military affairs?

Ans:

MILITARIZATION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND COMPUTING REVOLUTIONIZES THE MILITARY AFFAIRS IN THE FOLLOWING WAYS

1. Artificial intelligence and computing in this digital era is accomplishing the military tasks in least possible time - tasks once used to be manual and time consuming. In this way the efficiency of the military affairs has been improved because of the effective time management.

2. Miltary affairs is pace to pace with fast running timings, because of artificial intelligence and computing, in the present global village. Where the world is hasty because of this globalization and in no time one can get updated from the other ends of the world due to information technology.

3. Within the current global village the military allies supporting each other, share the technogical advancements with each other. Who risk destroying their enemies from any corner of the global village in no time. This has created a huge deficiency of peace promoting advocates.

4. Etc

5. Etc

[soft rock]

Q#8. Delineate the ways in which Covid-19 has affected the contours of the contemporary world order.



Ans:

COVID-19 AFFECTING THE CONTOURS OF THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD ORDER.

1. Economic downfall across the world because of the lockdown routines in COVID-19 affected countries.

2. Spoiled educational environments......... Damaged educational years......

3. Free daily ongoing vaccinations on massive standard to develop global immunity against COVID-19 is a hope across the nations..........

4. Rumors about the adverse effects vaccinations against COVID-19 has created uncertainity, mental fog, and doubt in the minds of ignorant vulnerable public. Whose daily life is badly affected.......

5. Uncertainties about the COVOD-19 in the muslim world due to already fragile beliefs in God. Limitation of pilgrims is also terrible for the muslim world, distancing during to the prayer in mosque, and ineffective supplications against the COVID-19 etc etc......

6. Prohibited Airline Service in COVID-19 affected countries.......

7. Fourth wave of COVID-19 is much more lethal , upholding the legacy of genocide.....

[Syeda Irum]

Post 5 year papers solution of current affairs... جزاک الله

[soft rock]

I request mods to delete this thread of mine please. I need some adjustment about this thread.


Thanks In Advance.