difficult words
 

i am facing problem in using words below....
[SIZE="4"]while
as well as
rather
whether
could
would
might
letting
let[/SIZE]

please....:sad:

(1) when you do some thing and at the same time if something else is also happening then you can use while."I HAVE BEEN PLAYING GAME WHILE WAITING IN QUE-outside the bank.

(2)He,as well as his uncle ,is coming next week. Be carefull while using verb (SINGULAR).

(3) Rather is same like prefer,but former is followed by base verb. I would rather go out than wait for him.
If you say the same thing by using prefer,it would be like; I would prefer to go out than to wait for him.(to + verb).
(4) Whether is used to introduce alternates, like; It is not your matter whether i stay or not.
For could,would,might, should, google model auxilary verb and their usage.
(5) Let means to allow; i will not let you do this again and again.
I hope this would be helpfull.

[QUOTE=Maria The Chemist;816433]i am facing problem in using words below....
[SIZE="4"]while
as well as
rather
whether
could
would
might
letting
let[/SIZE]

please....:sad:[/QUOTE]
[B]when[/B] and [B]while[/B] are conjunctions.
In some uses when and while can mean the same, but they can also have slightly different meanings. We use them to introduce subordinate clauses. We can use when and while to mean ‘during the time that’, to connect two events happening at the same time:
We often use them with the past continuous to refer to background events:
For example:
[B]While[/B] he was working, he often listened to music.

[B]As well as[/B]
The phrase "as well as" creates one of those situations where you may have to make a judgment call about comma usage. As a general rule, it doesn't need a comma before it unless it’s a part of a non-restrictive clause.
For example:
I like carrot cake [B]as well as[/B] chocolate cake, but lemon cake is my favorite.

[B]Rather[/B]
We use rather to give emphasis to an adjective or adverb. It has a similar meaning to quite when quite is used with grad able words. It is more formal than quite. We often use it to express something unexpected or surprising
For example:
No, I’m [B]rather[/B] busy, in fact.

[B]Whether[/B]
We can use whether to report indirect yes-no questions and questions with or. If is more common than whether
For example:
The teachers will be asked [B]whether[/B] they would recommend the book to their classes.

[B]Could[/B]
Could is the past tense of can, but it also has uses apart from that--and that is where the confusion lies. When could is used as the past tense of can, it refers to an ability that a person generally had in the past or to something that was generally possible in the past ("When I was younger, I could run for miles," or "It used to be you could buy lunch for a dollar.").Could is also used to refer to something that you wish to have or do but that is not possible ("If only we could be free of this tyrant!"). It’s also used to describe something that was possible but did not happen, used with the verb have ("We could have won if we had practiced harder."). Could can also express annoyance or another strong emotion ("He could have asked me if I needed help!" or "I could have died I was so embarrassed!"), but can isn’t used this way

[B]Would[/B]
Would is a little easier to understand because it is not related to could or can, and its uses are more specific. Would is used to talk about a possible situation that has not happened or that you are imagining ("I would quit my job if I won the lottery."), and it is also used with have to describe a situation that could have happened but did not ("She would have eaten less if she had known there was going to be dessert.").
Like could, would is used to describe something that you think is likely to be true or likely to happen ("I think the meal would [=could] feed ten people." "He said he would help me with this set of exercises when he gets home.").
Would can also be used to ask polite questions ("Would you mind if I had another cup of tea?"), or to wish for something ("I wish she would write a book."). It has several distinct uses that can and could do not, however: it is used to give opinions ("I wouldn't do that if I were you," or "I would say that she is in her 30s. [=it is my opinion that she is between 30 and 39 years old]"); it is used to express a willingness to do something ("I would be happy to take her to the airport"); and it is used to express frustration with something that you believe a person always does ("Well, he would say that, wouldn't he? He always says that!").

[B]Might[/B]
We use 'might' to suggest a small possibility of something. Often we read that 'might' suggests a smaller possibility that 'may', there is in fact little difference and 'might is more usual than 'may' in spoken English.
For example:
She [B]might[/B] be at home by now but it's not sure at all.

[B]Let[/B]
'Let' can mean 'allow' or 'give permission
For example
Our boss [B]let[/B] us leave early.
Let's + infinitive is often used to make a suggestion
For example
[B]Let's[/B] go to the cinema tonight

I hope it will helped
[B]Bes t of Luck[/B]

@mano and kamran
 

thanks for your reply
i need more clarification of could ,would.whether,and might.....


and i have some more difficult words.
who
whom
whose
as far as
further
further more.....


regards

mano do you like to check my essay mistakes...?@http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-compulsory-subjects/essay/99971-seniors-please-check-my-essay.html

[QUOTE=Maria The Chemist;817813]thanks for your reply
i need more clarification of could ,would.whether,and might.....


and i have some more difficult words.
who
whom
whose
as far as
further
further more.....


regards

mano do you like to check my essay mistakes...?@http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-compulsory-subjects/essay/99971-seniors-please-check-my-essay.html[/QUOTE]
[B]Who[/B]
"Who" is a subject pronoun like "he," "she" and "we" in the examples above. We use "who" to ask which person does an action or which person is a certain way.
[B]Example [/B]
Who made the birthday cake?

[B]Whom[/B]
"Whom" is an object pronoun like "him," "her" and "us." We use "whom" to ask which person receives an action.
[B]Example[/B]
Whom are you going to invite?

[B]Whose[/B]
"Whose" is a possessive pronoun like "his," "her" and "our." We use "whose" to find out which person something belongs to.
[B]Example[/B]
Whose dog is barking outside?

[B]As far as[/B]
"As far as" is more likely to be used in contexts where you're trying to be helpful, but you're (often, somewhat apologetically) pointing out that what you think may not be totally accurate

[B]Further [/B]
uses of further is something that is a longer distance away or something that happens that is in addition to what has already occurred.
We need to discuss this further.

[B]Furthermore[/B]
furthermore is used to add more information to what was already said or written.
[B]Example [/B]
We believe that the project is possible. Furthermore, we believe that we can do it within a few months.

and sorry for your last question because i'm also a beginner not a senior because i am in the process of learning

[QUOTE=Mano;818195][B]Who[/B]
"Who" is a subject pronoun like "he," "she" and "we" in the examples above. We use "who" to ask which person does an action or which person is a certain way.
[B]Example [/B]
Who made the birthday cake?

[B]Whom[/B]
"Whom" is an object pronoun like "him," "her" and "us." We use "whom" to ask which person receives an action.
[B]Example[/B]
Whom are you going to invite?

[B]Whose[/B]
"Whose" is a possessive pronoun like "his," "her" and "our." We use "whose" to find out which person something belongs to.
[B]Example[/B]
Whose dog is barking outside?

[B]As far as[/B]
"As far as" is more likely to be used in contexts where you're trying to be helpful, but you're (often, somewhat apologetically) pointing out that what you think may not be totally accurate

[B]Further [/B]
uses of further is something that is a longer distance away or something that happens that is in addition to what has already occurred.
We need to discuss this further.

[B]Furthermore[/B]
furthermore is used to add more information to what was already said or written.
[B]Example [/B]
We believe that the project is possible. Furthermore, we believe that we can do it within a few months.

and sorry for your last question because i'm also a beginner not a senior because i am in the process of learning[/QUOTE]

whom you are going to invite.

is correct becoz mostly this expression is used in indirect speeches

Q1: Translate the following into urdu.
(i). He had been afriad to fly with them.
(ii). The Hollands Operate a self sufficient farm.
(iii). In other, words, you are calling me a tyrant.
(iv) There is some inflammation of the gums.
(v). If you can't be a bush, be a bit of grass.

(B). translate into english.
1) Ache taleb-e-alim(students) hamesha saht mehnat krte hn.
2). Shor mat kro bache soo rhe hn.
3). kiya larke(boys) 2 gante se mosiki(music) soon rhe hn?.
4).Mere abba kal suba wapis ayenge.
5).Ham guzishta mah(month) lahore gya thy..

Q2. Change the voice of the following.
i).He is liked by all.
2).the cat drank all the milk.
3).Have you given her the pen?.
4).What will you have for the supper?.
5).He is being watched by the police.

(B) Fill in the blanks with proper propositions.
i).Faisalabad is famous…………its textile industry.
2).He was killed…………the robbers.
3). I haven't seen him……………August.
4).He didn't carry…………my orders.
5). she turned…………the request.

Plzzzzz solve it kindly,,,,,,!

i dont know how to do that urdu conversion. although i will try the second question
2.a) 1) everyone likes him.
2)the milk was drunk by the cat
3)m nt sure on this one
4)
5)the police is watching him
B) 1) for
2) by
3)since
4)my
5)down

1(B)
1. Brilliant students always work hard.
2. Don't make a noise; Children are sleeping
3. Have the boys been listening to music for the last two hours?
4. My father will come back tomorrow morning
5. We had been/went to Lahore last month.

please senior help me in contexual meaning
 

please senior help me in contexual meaning also how I will attempt it in exam as, for example decade means 10 years so how it would be its meaning in context..


For [decade] and half after WWII , there was [optimism] in the world that we had solved, or that technology would help us solve, the old problems of hunger, disease, illiteracy-- even [intolerance] . But in 1970s two new realities have become all too clear: one, technological progress has created new problems like pollution, unequal distribution of the benefits pf modernity and an uneasiness about the world we have created; and two, this advance has affected only about a quarter of world's people . The other 75 percent is still involved in the old and [bitter] struggles; This is the world of underdeveloped nations.

The picture of this underdeveloped world is a [grim] one.The majority of its population lives without what are considered the [barest] essentials in the Western world. There is a [precarious] balance between the amount of food available and the number of mouths to be fed; disease usually results in early death or permanent [debilitation]. [Vagrant] children fight the flies for food in the streets of Tehran; in calcutta there are homeless masses whose only sleeping places are the city's streets and sidewalks. For a billion and three-quarter inhabitants of south Asia, the annual per capita income is only a little more than $100-- less then the increase in earnings.reported in 1969 by the north atlantic communities. In 1950, the lower two-third of the world's population earned only 13 percent of the total world income; by 1970 this share had fallen to below 11 percent. This situation in brief, grows worse,not better.

Most of the underdeveloped lies in the southern and eastern parts of globe, but it has not always been thus; for centuries Europe looked to the east for riches,and the [misery] and poverty now [epidemic] in Africa were not known 200 years ago. The reasons for this tragic [transition] are various, chief among them the population problem, the food crisis, and the [aftermath] of [colonialism].