Quote:
Originally Posted by The dream of rain
Original topic
The official name of our species is homo sapiens; but there are many anthropologists who prefer to think of man as homo Faber-the smith, the maker of tools It would be possible. I think, to reconcile these two definitions in a third. If man is a knower and an efficient doer, it is only because he is also a talker In order to be Faber and Sapiens, Homo must first be loquax, the loquacious one. Without language we should merely be hairless chimpanzees. Indeed we should be some thing much worse. Possessed of a high IQ but no language, we should be like the Yahoos of Gulliver's Travels- Creatures too clever to be guided by instinct, too Self-centered to live in a state of animal grace, and therefore condemned forever, frustrated and malignant, between contented ape-hood and aspiring humanity. It was language that made possible the accumulation of knowledge and the broadcasting of information. It was language that permitted the expression of religious insight, the formulation of ethical ideals, the codification to laws, It was language, in a word, that turned us into human beings and gave birth to civilization.
Preci
Title: Importance of language
Man without language would be an animal, an uncivilized and intelligent being. Language made him an intelligent being and the creator of tools. It enabled man to receive knowledge and information. It also provided him conduit to express his views, knowledge and information. Besides, it enabled him to enact ethical and legal norms. Therefore, language transformed an animal into a civilized and intellectual being.
Critical reviews are anticipated.
|
Although we are termed as Homo-sapiens, anthropologists prefer naming us as Homo-Fabers.The writer believes ,such deduction aroused from our talking ability.Comprehensively, learning and developing is by dint of communication. Without language, the writer compare human with Chimpanzees, rather worse. The writer present analogy of humans without linguistics to Yahoos – characters of Gullivers travels,citing their inability to human progress. Language helped compile knowledge and its dissemination. Religion, ethics and laws progressed through language. The writer concludes by suggesting that language enabled humanity and civilisation.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk