|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
seniors plz check my precis
2012 past paper
One of the most ominous and discreditable symptoms of the want of candour in present-day sociology is the deliberate neglect of the population question. It is or should be transparently clear that if the State is resolved, on humanitarian grounds, to inhibit the operation of natural selection, some rational regulation of population, both as regards quantity and quality, is imperatively necessary. There is no self-acting adjustment, apart from starvation, of numbers to the means of subsistence. If all natural checks are removed, a population in advance of the optimum number will be produced, and maintained at the cost of a reduction in the standard of living. When this pressure begins to be felt, that section of the population which is capable of reflection, and which has a standard of living which may be lost, will voluntarily restrict its numbers, even to the point of failing to replace deaths by an equivalent number of new births; while the underworld, which always exists in every civilised society the failures and misfits and derelicts, moral and physical will exercise no restraint, and will be a constantly increasing drain upon the national resources. The population will thus be recruited, in a very undue proportion, by those strata of society which do not possess the qualities of useful citizens. The importance of the problem would seem to be sufficiently obvious. But politicians know that the subject is unpopular. The unborn have no votes. Employers like a surplus of labour, which can be drawn upon when trade is good. Militarists want as much food for powder as they can get. Revolutionists instinctively oppose any real remedy for social evils; they know that every unwanted child is a potential insurgent. All three can appeal to a quasi-religious prejudice, resting apparently on the ancient theory of natural rights, which were supposed to include the right of unlimited procreation. This objection is now chiefly urged by celibate or childless priests; but it is held with such fanatical vehemence that the fear of losing the votes which they control is a welcome excuse for the baser sort of politician to shelve the subject as inopportune. The Socialist calculation is probably erroneous; for experience has shown that it is aspiration, not desperation, that makes revolutions. Precis: The inconsideration of population question is something intentional in sociology. To evolve the process of natural selection, the government should introduce measures on welfare, to maintain the quality and quantity. The population growth and resources are inversely proportional to each other. The elite strata of society keeps its birth to an equivalent number of death while the poor strata is not being able to restricts its abnormal birth. This results in increasing the quantity of citizens instead of quality. Politicians have no concern with the increasing population, they only need votes and cheap labour force. Revolutionists have not find any solution of social evils; they knew that every undesired child is biased and extremist. The socialist assessment is incorrect and history proved that ambitions make revolution not discouragement.(130 words) Title: Neglect of the population question |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
please check precis of 1995 paper. | noor14 | Precis | 3 | Sunday, November 26, 2017 05:57 PM |
please check paper 1994 precis. | noor14 | Precis | 5 | Monday, October 23, 2017 03:05 PM |
English (Precis & Composition) Solved Paper-2012. Please Check. | Sana Rizwan Qureshi | English (Precis & Composition) | 0 | Saturday, November 23, 2013 10:16 PM |
Plz check my precis | Abdul Ghafoor kakar | Precis | 6 | Wednesday, May 29, 2013 10:46 PM |
plz check my precis of year 2007 | fitman | Precis | 6 | Friday, April 27, 2012 03:30 PM |