Does pitfalls in democracy leading another military term? comments
 

A [U]Introduction[/U]
Past scenario
B [U]Does pitfalls in democracy in Pakistan leading another army term? yes[/U]
C [U]Responsible factor weakening democracy in Pakistan[/U]
a Incompetent leadership
b Friendly Opposition
c Nepotism
d Remote-control politics (MQM-PPP)
e Provincial-federation conflicts
f Double-cross policies
g Rigging based election, cum-selection
D [U]How to stabilize the Democracy in Pakistan[/U]
a Competent Leadership
b True Opposition
c True and Transparent election
d Free State Institutions
e Stable and Strong Policies
f Abolishment of Nepotism
g Central-provincial harmony
h Theo-Democracy instead of Democracy
i Transparent Law
E [U]Conclusion[/U]

Dear,you need a lot of improvement in writing. At the very beginning you are mentioning yes; what it means?A clear cut stance that you have missed your [B]thesis[/B]. Secondly, the question is demanding your stance as under what conditions dictatorship can prevail in Pakistan, so you must be specific about the issue.

some mistakes
[QUOTE]e Provincial-federation conflicts f Double-cross policies g Rigging based election, cum-selection[/QUOTE]

it must be federal provincial conflict, not double cross policies but politics, and rigged elections
please elaborate me the word theodemocracy as well.(I heard this word first time)
I hope issues will be settled accordingly.;)

ok got it
 

theodemocracy is an extreme form of democracy as mentioned in dawn's article.

obviously; the factors that i have mentioned no doubt leading/inviting military to rule.
second; i am agree with the fact (yes) that these are very basic conditions in which military over through the existing system.
i think according to you; the question is demanding your stance as under what conditions dictatorship can prevail in Pakistan.
How to stabilize the Democracy in Pakistan
a Competent Leadership
b True Opposition
c True and Transparent election
d Free State Institutions
e Stable and Strong Policies
f Abolishment of Nepotism
g Central-provincial harmony
h Theo-Democracy instead of Democracy
i Transparent Law.

Are not these measures enough to prevent dictatorship in pakistan?
sir its my regard that you are giving concern but if not these then can you kindly give some tips.:mad:

Are not these measures enough to prevent dictatorship in pakistan?

[QUOTE=sameermuharramuddin;909379]obviously; the factors that i have mentioned no doubt leading/inviting military to rule.

second; i am agree with the fact (yes) that these are very basic conditions in which military over through the existing system.
i think according to you; the question is demanding your stance as under what conditions dictatorship can prevail in Pakistan.
How to stabilize the Democracy in Pakistan
a Competent Leadership
b True Opposition
c True and Transparent election
d Free State Institutions
e Stable and Strong Policies
f Abolishment of Nepotism
g Central-provincial harmony
h Theo-Democracy instead of Democracy
i Transparent Law.

Are not these measures enough to prevent dictatorship in pakistan?:mad:[/QUOTE]
I agree with your points and I even didn’t say that I have differences with you, only point of contention is your wrong [B]usage of phrases[/B] such as
[QUOTE]Provincial-federation conflicts
f Double-cross policies
g Rigging based election, cum-selection[/QUOTE]
And I’ve just [B]rectified[/B] these.:)
[QUOTE] i am agree with the fact (yes) that these are very basic conditions in which military over through the existing system.[/QUOTE]
In that situation I just asked for your thesis statement.:roll
[QUOTE]How to stabilize the Democracy in Pakistan
a Competent Leadership
b True Opposition
c True and Transparent election
d Free State Institutions
e Stable and Strong Policies
f Abolishment of Nepotism
g Central-provincial harmony
h Theo-Democracy instead of Democracy
i Transparent Law.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=sameermuharramuddin;909374]theodemocracy is an extreme form of democracy as mentioned in dawn's article.[/QUOTE]
Let me clear you one thing, theodemocracy means “Democracy which is run by religious figures” which employs that PML(n) is basically [B]pro Saudi[/B] in origin and their policies are viewed within the [U]religious paradigm[/U]. Common notion is that [I]Chaudary Nisar is not taking action against Molana Abdul Aziz [/I]due to his support in general elections.
[QUOTE]sir its my regard that you are giving concern but if not these then can you kindly give some tips[/QUOTE]
Alright, if I were you than I would like to mention the thesis like
[B][U]Pakistan is not leading towards military rule; in fact hegemony of military institutions has already outmaneuvered civilian performance.[/U][/B]
Note: it’s my thesis and I’ve many reasons to justify my statement, such as implementation of Nap through army, Karachi operation via Rangers, and prosecution of terrorism through military courts: even General Raheel Sharif has better reputation than Nawaz Sharif and so on….(similarly, you have your own)

Making notes and your analysis is the best key of your own judgments. For example, while reading theodemocracy what you perceive and then ask yourself some journalistic questions of ‘wh’s’.
How theodemocracy is linked with military dictatorship? Why we do believe that dictatorship has a chance to oust the democratically elected government? Under what question it is favorable? How much support has military gained from general public? And so many other questions like these. Search out the answers and draw down the thesis.
Hope you got the point.:D

thank you for your precious time.
 

my thesis statement

The leading factors that weaken democracy, unfortunately all factor exists in Pakistan. Despite, there are some measures under follow. Undoubtedly these not only can stabilize the democracy but also prevent the military sake in Pakisan.

for these points
 

Provincial-federation conflicts=for this there are many examples. but for instant recent conflict such as conflict over CPEC and ongoing Karachi operation the conflict between center and provinces is under debate.
Double-cross policies= misleading policies such as arrest uzair baloch through interpol while sympathy for MQM leader who directly threaten the writ of government and establishment.
Rigging based election, cum-selection=sit in by PTI QAT (ayaz latif palejo) hyderabad based PAI (liaquat jatoi) dadu based. in all sit in the situation goes to worsen form bad where such incidents( like attack on PTV) happen.

sir i have points to explain my outline as above mentioned. and there may be and is mistake that's why you noticed. for this i have posted now its time to share your experience for this i shall very thankful to you.
[U] [/U]
People learns form mistakes.
Though, no one can be perfect in all:waiting

[QUOTE=sameermuharramuddin;909456]
People learns form mistakes.
Though, no one can be perfect in all:waiting[/QUOTE]
Very good and my intention is also same, this is the reason why i have mentioned.
[QUOTE]Note: it’s my thesis and I’ve many reasons to justify my statement, such as implementation of Nap through army, Karachi operation via Rangers, and prosecution of terrorism through military courts: even General Raheel Sharif has better reputation than Nawaz Sharif and so on….([B]similarly, you have your own)
[/B][/QUOTE]
:):):):)

thank you sir
 

lets another outline INSHA ALLAH within hours:D