Essay: Climate Change:Myth or Reality?

[Aanwar]

Outline:

1 Introduction.
Climate Change is a reality( my stance)

2 Conceptualizing the phenomenon of Climate change.

3 Arguments to Justify the indeed climate change is a reality:

1-Rise in global average temperature.
2-Melting of ice-caps and sheets in polar regions.
3-increasing sea level.
4-intense and frequent hurricanes
5- Change in weather patters.
6-Droughts and receding underground water level.
7-Issue of Smog, acidic rain
8-wild fire issues in American continent.
9-resurgence of primitive diseases.
( the above mentioned points are glimpses)
4- How to combat climate change:
- At individual Level
- At national level
- At international level

5- conclusion



kindly evaluate.
Jazak'Allah

[highly uploaded]

Asalamoalikum
Bro, you simply picked / choosed deliberately one side of the topic or coin i.e that CC is reality. However topic doesn't allow to. One is supposed to shed light on both sides and can be leaned toward one side but its not necessary. Since CC is both myth & reality with same amount of arguments each side hence both aspects are part of this essay.

[Aanwar]

W.salam
thanks you for sparing time to look comment on my outline.

In my humble opinion, dont we have you to take a stance and provide arguments to prove out stance?
But, yeah you are right balance approach safe choice .

[aristotlekhan]

I'm agree with Anwar. In such type of essays you must take one side and then prove it. Had the topic named as "Climate change is both myth and reality" then you must have to prove both sides.

[highly uploaded]

Hey guys,,, don't get me wrong I am just commenting and arguing so be cool.
My point is, this is exam of essay it is not some kind of research hypothesis where you have to prove something with facts and figures. You should know that "Essay is a lyric in prose." Thats what they say it to define what it is. As FPSC exam paper says you are supposed to use different form of courses like
exposition, argumentation, description and narration. Further credit will be given for clarity, relevance and organization.. It means it is about your style of presentation of your opinion on the given topic. Your argument of taking one stance in a given topic and proving it seem me unnecessary. I think it doesn't matter. You are given a hole topic not its parts. Its all yours. You are restricted to choose one among topics and not a side within a topic. As I already said in previous comment that you can favour one side of topic but you cannot completely eliminate a side of topic. Now let me convince you how taking one side is wrong..... Suppose if any body is given your outline without topic and asked to read this outline carefully and suggest a suitable topic then HE WOULD CERTAINLY NAME IT AS """CLIMATE CHANGE: A REALITY".. No body could possibly get any clue from your outline that there is a mention about myth of CC. Because your outline speaks only about REALITY. Now I think it is enough to understand.

[Aanwar]

Dear highly uploaded, we are only discussing and giving our views, not fight or altercating.

Yeah your argument has a valid point that we should keep in view while writing an essay.

i think we can balance the above mentioned outline by adding one whole paragraph about the views of skeptics.

@aristotlekhan shb thank you!