Tuesday, April 16, 2024
12:12 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Compulsory Subjects > Essay

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Wednesday, April 18, 2018
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Karachi
Posts: 36
Thanks: 3
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
SamiShaikh is on a distinguished road
Default Please Evaluate

Gender Equality

Controlling Idea: strengthens democracy (benefit)

Gender equality will undoubtedly buttress democracy. The entire point of democracy is people hold ultimate power. Therefore, it only seems plausible to involve them in the process. Mainstreaming women voting is the need of an hour – especially in Pakistan. The gains aren’t only limited to voting. We must have women leaders too. This has far-reaching and instrumental impacts. It means that woman will have a say in the policy and that is a necessity since women form about 49% of our population. The voter turnout has stagnantly persisted below 60% in Pakistan and in this percentage about 80% are men. The issue is exceedingly grave in rural areas. Research has shown that democracies have flourished when women participated in the entire process. Overall, democracy fares well when women participate in it uninterruptedly.


Seniors, please evaluate the above-written paragraph
Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Thursday, April 19, 2018
Monk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 691
Thanks: 293
Thanked 643 Times in 317 Posts
Monk will become famous soon enoughMonk will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamiShaikh View Post
Gender Equality



Controlling Idea: strengthens democracy (benefit)



Gender equality will undoubtedly buttress democracy. The entire point of democracy is people hold ultimate power. Therefore, it only seems plausible to involve them in the process. Mainstreaming women voting is the need of an hour – especially in Pakistan. The gains aren’t only limited to voting. We must have women leaders too. This has far-reaching and instrumental impacts. It means that woman will have a say in the policy and that is a necessity since women form about 49% of our population. The voter turnout has stagnantly persisted below 60% in Pakistan and in this percentage about 80% are men. The issue is exceedingly grave in rural areas. Research has shown that democracies have flourished when women participated in the entire process. Overall, democracy fares well when women participate in it uninterruptedly.





Seniors, please evaluate the above-written paragraph

Thank you


Paragraph structure is fine. However, there are some mistakes of grammar and sentence construction.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Thursday, April 19, 2018
Monk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 691
Thanks: 293
Thanked 643 Times in 317 Posts
Monk will become famous soon enoughMonk will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamiShaikh View Post
Gender Equality



Controlling Idea: strengthens democracy (benefit)



Mainstreaming women voting is the need of an hour – especially in Pakistan. .

Need of the hour not an hour


Quote:
Originally Posted by SamiShaikh View Post
Gender Equality



Controlling Idea: strengthens democracy (benefit)



The gains aren’t only limited to voting. We must have women leaders too.


First sentence is not a sentence but a fragment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old Thursday, April 19, 2018
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Karachi
Posts: 36
Thanks: 3
Thanked 13 Times in 11 Posts
SamiShaikh is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monk View Post
Need of the hour not an hour






First sentence is not a sentence but a fragment.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
overall, where do you think I stand in terms of clarity, coherence, and paragraph development?
thank you for the correction, means a lot
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old Friday, April 20, 2018
Monk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 691
Thanks: 293
Thanked 643 Times in 317 Posts
Monk will become famous soon enoughMonk will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamiShaikh View Post
overall, where do you think I stand in terms of clarity, coherence, and paragraph development?
thank you for the correction, means a lot


You know the paragraph structure and that’s the key. Your expression, arguments and clarity of thought will improve as you go through optionals


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old Friday, April 20, 2018
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 339
Thanks: 41
Thanked 171 Times in 119 Posts
tajmeer will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monk View Post
You know the paragraph structure and that’s the key. Your expression, arguments and clarity of thought will improve as you go through optionals


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can you please evaluate my piece of work.

FATA- Reforms. A step to merger with KP
Since the incident of 9/11 FATA has been the center of attention for every one whether that is the local media or international organizations. Everyone is discussing the fate of FATA in the 21st century, but no real steps have been taken to mainstream it. Since the colonel period FATA was without any proper administrative control which make a safe haven for non- state actors to exploit the simplicity of the people of a region and use them for the international agendas. History is evident that the people of NWFP and FATA were deprived from their basic rights since the early period of British raj. From 1901-32 NWFP was under the administrative control of Chief Commissioner, and comprised of D.I. Khan, Hazara, Peshawar, Kohat, and Bannu districts. In the Nehru report (1928), and Jinnah’s Fourteen Points (1929), both emphasized for reforms in NWFP. From 1955-1970 NWFP was administered from Lahore under One Unit which was abolished in 1970, and NWFP was declared as a separate province. On the other hand, principle states such as Amb, Swat, Dir and Chitral joined NWFP in 1969. Consequently, the government under Article 246-B given these states the status of PATA (Provincially Administered Tribal Areas). In 1975, through PATA Regulation, PATA were provided with some packages such as tax exemption, extension of electoral system, removal of FCR, regular courts, and representation in the provincial assembly.
Under the Local Government Ordinance 2001, Malakand was declared as a district, all of the administrative components were introduced except police, federal funded Levies were retained.
In 1994, Supreme Court abolished PATA, which created a vacuum of administration in the area, eventually it was exploited by the non-state actors’ e.g TNSM, AND TTP.
__________________
“You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough.”
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Evaluate my precis Tooba2 English (Precis & Composition) 16 Friday, October 09, 2020 11:36 AM
Please Evaluate: Free Speech Should have limitations Naveed_Bhuutto Essays 23 Saturday, October 19, 2019 08:38 PM
please plaese please evaluate my precis please Nazento Precis 1 Monday, January 12, 2015 10:27 PM
Lets solve the IR past papers dr.atifrana International Relations 1 Saturday, May 09, 2009 10:22 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.