CSS Forums - Essay 2017 Outline

[SIZE="5"][B]BEING A MINORITY IS A FATE NO ONE WANT. CAN NATIONALISM BE REALLY INCLUSIVE?[/B][/SIZE]
1. Introduction

Thesis: [I]As past has proved and the present continues to prove, nationalism cannot really be inclusive. It is based upon the idea of the indifference of one nation towards another. [/I]

[B]2 Understanding the terminology[/B]

2a. Who are minorities?
2b. What is nationalism?

[B]3 Why nationalism cannot really be inclusive?[/B]

3a. It is based upon the idea that one nation has superiority over another one.
3b. Nationalistic societies tend to be intolerant since they love their own origin, culture, ethnicity, or religion.
3c. Instead of inclusion, nationalism engenders imperialism and colonialism.

[B]4 Examples that prove nationalism is not inclusive[/B]

[U]From past[/U]

4a. Bosnian Muslims were maimed and killed to achieve a homogenous Bosnian state.
4b. Holocaust happened because the Germans, especially Hitler, believed that the Aryan race was superior.
4c. The Bolsheviks persecution of anyone who was against communism is another significant example.

[U]At present [/U]

4d. The persecution of Indian held Kashmiris is a prominent case.
4e. Ethnic cleansing of Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar is another leading example.
4f. Muslim Uighurs in Chinese Tibet region are being socialized to accept the Chinese Communist Party’s nationalism.

[B]5 Modern-day nationalism [/B]

5a. Immigration policies have been tightened in Europe.
5b. Nationalistic and isolationistic leaders are being elected.
5c. The trend of trade wars clearly portrays that nationalism is in the upsurge.
5d. The United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union understandably illustrates how globalization is in retreat.

6 Conclusion

I'd be highly indebted if you people could assess the outline and help me in refining it for better
Thank you