Kindly check thesis statement and outline.
 

[CENTER][B][SIZE="7"]Might is right[/SIZE][/B][/CENTER]

[B]Thesis Statement[/B]

One who possess the power either economically, military or politically has the right to rule on the under-powered and poor people and can get them to do whatever he wants.

[B]Outline:
[/B]
What does the term “Might is Right” means?
Karl Marx’s Theory of Class Conflict
Historical Perspective:
1- US forceful invasion of Iran & Iraq
2- US’s detonation of atom bomb on Japan
3- Holocaust
4- Soviet – Afghan War
5- Arab – Israel War
6- Mongols invasion of Indian sub-continent
7- Burma Issue
8- War of Independence 1857
Causes:
1- Corruption
2- Political Influence
3- Economically strong
4- Weak judicial system
5- Bad situation of educational system
6- Unknowing the Law
7- Justice is just for the Rich
8- Weak Law enforcement and legislation
Effects:
1- Centralization of Power
2- Exploitation of Rights
3- Non-provision of Justice
4- Terrorism
5- Weak Economy
6- Illiteracy
7- Survival of the fittest

Solution:
1- Strong Legislation
2- Access of Justice to Poor
3- Depoliticize the Law enforcement and legislative institutes
4- Equal rights
5- Educate the people
6- Taxation of Rich
7- Removal of Corruption
Conclusion

overall it is a good attempt, it seems it would be better if coherence and some innovative ideas embellish to it.

for instance, gender parity is one of the recognizing and an emerging aspect of the 21st century you may include it as because of frailty myth and muscular power half of the population has been discriminating and societal, national and international order is running by patriarchal minds.

moreover, when you take the example of the west it would be better put them under some recognized terms such as colonialism and imperialism so on.

i could have gone with opposite stance, any how well tried but too much of historic side

shah jii, you are right abovementioned outline is heavily colored with historical examples and citations, but for this sort of doctrine, I convinced, it would safe to be sided with popular view mean hereby one has to struggle to negate this statement.

[QUOTE=sidraaslam;1076601]shah jii, you are right abovementioned outline is heavily colored with historical examples and citations, but for this sort of doctrine, I convinced, it would safe to be sided with popular view mean hereby one has to struggle to negate this statement.[/QUOTE]

Yes you are right, But one in thousand will go against this stance and will eventually stand out. :pp

Agreed, but if the piece of work really worth to stand out of thousands. Most of the time this idiosyncrasy has a heavy cost. Well, I really want to see your arguments in the negation of the given statement, if possible for you.

Brainstorming should be appreciated here, Just wanna add if you make it more clear by adding international perspective (Holocaust, Iraq & Afghan war, ISIS etc), National Perspective (Dictatorship, feudal system in some areas, etc), Economic perspective ( Economic sanctions on North Korea, Iran but aid to Israel), Social Perspective (Justice system, treatment in police stations , health sector etc), Gender Perspective ( male dominant society, Women missing basic rights etc) and so on... :)

you might misunderstand it. Here, 'might is right a metaphase' which means might bend laws and practices in its favour or interest and remains unaccountable. here, 'right' is not about ethics or laws and antonym to wrong. just google once.

I replied in the same sense. Just mentioned points which can be easily elaborated, the misuse of power by Hitler against jews, same misuse by superpower USA in Iraq war although UN was against it.
Dictators abuse power in their favour like Musharraf dismissed CJP Iftikhar Ch.
USA put economic sanctions against North Korea and Iran because of their nuclear programs while aiding Israel who also hv nukes (Might is right).
Difference of treatment in courts, police stations between rich and poor (rich culprits get out of prison easily while poor innocent people serve for years).
Domestic violence, women are abused by men in male dominant society (Human Rights commission of Pakistan report).

you are also saying MIGHT IS RIGHT, mean hereby in all cases which you mentioned might exploiter but unaccountable because of its clout. In that way, this is no negation of a statement. well, its ok if you are not getting my point, good luck. (one more thing, I did not intend to indulge into a contentious argument but just want to clarify what I was meant)