And how point no 3 ( democracy) and point 4 (public partnership) contradict in addition to the sameness of meaning of point 4 ( partnership or cooperation) and point 5 (digitalisation)

Please re-read the outlines, diversity is clearly there. Health, economy, politics, all aspects are highlighted in different points

__________________
The fear of suffering is worse than the suffering itself.

1. COVID has impacted an end to globalisation. It means globalisation is death and COVID has a role in it.
2. COVID has triggered an end to globalisation. It means COVID has presented itself a serious challenger for Globalization.
point 4 (multiple challenges), 3 ( how has globalisation..) and 5 (blueprints) mean your main paragraphs

See, your interpretation of 'tirggered globalisation' commensurate with my interpretation of the topic. Also, all my headings, i.e. challenges, steps taken to prove globalisation still exists, and necessary steps to be taken pinpointed the topic correctly. Thanks for your feedback

__________________
The fear of suffering is worse than the suffering itself.

Such topics are not my forte but I have tried to analyze to the best of my knowledge. Be critical, and evaluate it.

Covid-19 has triggered an end to globalisation.

1) Introduction

Covid-19 has the potential to start the process of de-globalization in certain domains but it will not end it altogether. However it is true that it has exposed weaknesses of rhetoric of the free economic world order. In doing so, COVID 19 has the potential to trigger regionalization as a substitute to globalization.

2) Globalization was already in doldrums even before COVID 19: case of economic crunch of 2008 and trade wars between USA and China

3) Evidence that Covid 19 will amplify the process of de-globalization in certain domains

i) Replacement of long supply chains with local supply chains and utilization of domestic manpower -- end to mantra of cheap labor

ii) More uglier and intense trade wars due to economic loss caused by COVID 19

iii) Rise of populism and anti-global leaders in post Covid 19 world -- alteration of liberal world order

iv ) Leadership vacuum left by the liberal West and increasing role of Communist China – start of new Cold war

v) Mass migration caused by Covid 19 and more Walls and anti-migrant laws—death to "American Dream" of globalized world

vi) Deepening inequalities in COVID 19 times and an inward-looking world—antithesis of global village

vi) Ineffective and lethargic role of global institution in the pandemic of COVID 19 and eroded trust in their capacity to solve global problems: case of failure of World Health Organization

4) Areas where Globalization will continue to flourish in post-Covid 19 world

i) Flow of ides
ii) World trade and business chains
iii) Transfer of technology
iv) People movement

5) How Coivd 19 has the potential to trigger regionalism as a substitute to globalization

i) Inward looking states will prefer local trade by creating regional blocs – rise of trade barriers

ii) Failure of global institution will increase importance of regional organizations

6) Can globalization be saved? Yes:
For globalization to flourish in post-Covid 19 world it will have to:

i) Become more equitable

ii) Become more sensitized to the need of under developed world

iii) Transfer of technology to end dependence of third world over first world

iv) Responsible role of leaders of liberal world order and institutions: Climate change is test case in Post Coivd-19 world

7)Conclusion

Point (ii) in heading 4 needs to be emitted as it is in conflict with my thesis.

bro actually examiner ko smjana hmara kam hai bs. woh 2nd br apka paper ni perhyga so apne ne aisa lkhna hai k 5th cls ka becha b phli br perhy to smj jaye.