Oooooopppssss....I wrote against the topic
 

Great nations win without fighting

1. Introduction: Great nations with fighting....I classified the fights in two categories: armed and unarmed.

2. Armed Fights: Last resort of great nations

3. Fights in the light of Islam
3.1. Fight against human temptations.
3.2. Fight against Satan
3.3 Fight for the propagation of Islam (conditions applied)

"Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you
but do not transgress for Allah loveth not transgressors"

5. Fights in the light of the International Law
5.1. UN Charter

5. Armed Fights

5.1. Just armed fights

5.1.1 For the propagation of Islam
a. Fights fought by Hazrat Muhammad (SAW)
b. Fights fought by Caliphs
c. Fights fought by Sufis

5.1.2. For Independence
a. American war of independence
b. Pakistan
c. South Africa
d. Palestine
e. Kashmir

5.1.3. Against Oppression
a. French Revolution
b. Russian Revolution
c. Iranian Revolution

5.2. Unjust armed fights

5.2.1 For Resources and Power
a. WW1 and ww2
b. Wars of the USA with Afghanistan and Iraq
c. Fight of Taliban in Pakistan

"Turning and turning into the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer
Things fall apart; centre cannot hold
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world"

5.3. Wars are not always bad
5.3.1. They produce heroes
5.3.2. Promote patriotism
5.3.3. Awake nations from deep slumber

6. Unarmed Fights
6.1. Against Poverty
6.2. Against Illiteracy
6.3. For social and economic development

7. Wars to be avoided in future
7.1. Cyber wars
7.2. Nuclear wars
8. Conclusion

"Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable...
every step towards the goal of justice requires sacrifice,
suffering, and struggle; the tireless exertions and passionate
concerns of dedicated individuals"

First I thought to write in favor of the topic but seriously I couldn't find even a single country with history of no wars or armed fights...even the countries like China have full history of wars and even today china shows aggressive tendencies, and so the other countries. that's what i thought it can be wrong, please share your valuable opinion.

Dear Fellow, This topic is a hypothesis and if you can prove it wrong then you're right, no problem with this approach. Moreover, in fact the topic is about nation (or modern nation state) while your outline suggests something else. Anyhow, keep the candle of hope alive. Regards

An essay is not just Expansion of the topic and because they ask to use [B]argumentation[/B], you can surely go against the topic. So don't worry about that.

It is excellent to have a giant’s strength
But it is tyrannical to use it like a giant

This quotation brings an undeniable reality to the readers that human beings by nature are desirous to have power and dominance in their lives. Most of the people strive to become powerful at any cost. In reality there is no harm in getting power but to use it violently create havoc in the society. Therefore, it can be evaluated by the examples of historical figures and the conduct of different nations.

Primarily, there are many historical persons who brutally misuse power in their ruling periods. In the case of Pharaoh who claimed himself the incarnation of God on the earth after becoming the king Egypt. As a result, he had been perished because of despotic rule which he used against the people of Moses and God made him example for future generation to learn the lesson. Likewise, Hitler and Napoleon were two dictators who desperately harm people for a long time. However, there are rare people in history who ruled justly. Among them, one of the balanced personality was Prophet Mohammad (PBUH) who not only supremely successful on the religious ground but also on the secular level despite having immense power.

Moreover, these lines apply to the dominating nations throughout the world as well. After having technological advanced, the western countries want to stabilize their social, political and economical status at the expense of underdeveloped nations. As a matter of fact, they do not want to see under developed nations on an equal status. For instance, China’s economic supremacy is great threat to the US, Turkey’s development has negative impacts on European countries, Russia and America rivalry over Syrian issue, etc. Obviously, these developed nations exploit their strength to achieve personal objectives. That’s why it is rightly to quote that “Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (by Lord Acton).

In conclusion, it is highly recommendable for people as well as for nations that they should utilize ultimate supremacy to relieve oppressive people and to facilitate the equal opportunities to underdeveloped nations. Shortly, both power and strength lessen with the passage of time but one has to be accountable for his/her actions in the long run.

Dear seniors read and comment.