i totally agree with futuristic that this topic wasn't intended for pro and against arguments.
probably you should have mentioned the major troubles of devices rather than going straight to their worth because that is reason that this question arise in the first place.no one doubts the usefulness of the machines.
also the second sentence of your outline suggest that you have changed the word troubles with productive boldly.this gives the impression as if you have misunderstood the topic or changed the theme.
But don't be upset because overall your outline is coherent.
pardon me for my harsh words since you have asked for it and i have given my honest opinion.

Your criticism is welcome . One can always go against any topic. like in the first topic one could have said that war on terror is not a violation of human rights. or one could have said that anticipation is not better than realization. or that punctuality is virtue of the virtuous. or that digital technology hasn't altered technologies etc. In CSS, as far as i have learned from seniors, it does not matter what your argument is, what matters is whether you are able to prove your argument or not. I passed essay last time. I did not go against the topic that time but let's see what happens now

But now if you agree with me that one can go against a topic, have i done justice to my argument? Your further criticism would be even more welcome Stay blessed.

Yes I did I have lost paper A actually. will upload paper B tomorrow. And will try to write questions from Paper A from memory as well. Stay Blessed.

Though I agree with you that one could go against any topic but you have redefined the topic.The opposite of "troublesome" is not necessarily "productive".You could have simply said that the labour saving devices were not more troublesome than they were worth.Nevertheless, your approach to your own chosen direction of essay is pragmatic, and I hope you pass the exam.

this was the thesis statement:

"labor saving devices are not only not troublesome they are more productive than they are worth"

now sir what do you say

This statement looks better��

Going against the topic is not a healthy approach at all. When the examiner has already taken a stance that labor saving devices are more troublesome, then there is no need to go against the topic. If the topic were ' labor saving devices; blessing or curse?', then you would take a side and prove your stance. However, it's always safer to move with the tide. Dear, you have argued utterly against the examiner's opinion. It's very hard to convince him in such a way. Still i wish you a good luck.

__________________
Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it.

Well guys I started this thread to know view point regarding the said essay.My fellow aspirants have tried very well and I pray for their mighty success.
Here is my outline ,I need your response.I cleared essay exam twice I.e 2013 and 2014 but you need never know when we is your bad day.
OUTLINE
1.Automobiles.....synching distance or creating panic!
Traffic jams,fuel issue,pollution..
Walk for health
2.Computer and related items...a source of anxiety
Data coppied,corrupt,theft,operating system problem,software problem,electricity issue!
3.Cellular technology.......leave me alone please!!!
Have you installed the new app?
Charging issue,miss communication,near to friends far from family,increasing debt on p pocket
4.Case studies:
A.Scottish referendum ....manipulating the results
B.Pharmaceutical industry (in this I explained a scenario in which wrong medicine was packed resulting in deaths)
5.IT devices and electronic gadgets .....increased dependence and dissatisfaction
Electronic dictionary vs printed one
ATM ...... A betrayal
Story of one day before eid.
Fraud,theft
Bank is better
6.Online research: Copy paste PhD.s
Dilemma of developing countries
7.email vs postal system
Delivered ,undilevered .....a headache!!
Loss if emotional sentiments and charm of letter opening
8.Impact on our lives
Idleness,diss satisfaction.psychological distress,emotional disturbances,anxiety and depression.
In between I also added xerox machine,biometric system,social media and problems associated with them.
Kindly share your valuable thoughts.

__________________
If winter comes....can spring be far behind??

I concentrated more on troubles associated with the devices and less on their worth and usefulness.

__________________
If winter comes....can spring be far behind??

dear, the last point, impact on our lives, should have been given at the very first place. The examiner is interested more in knowing the troublesome impact of labor saving devices on human life. He is very less concerned about the enviornment etc. You should have explored more on negative impact of labor saving devices. It's my opinion; one may disagree with it.

__________________
Success usually comes to those who are too busy to be looking for it.

@ futuristic

Bro your perspective is perfect i would say but here it is...

An outline is supposed to be 'clear'. see your outline begins with:

1.Automobiles.....synching distance or creating panic!

so what? What does it even mean? What are you trying to say?

the first line under the introduction heading should be your thesis statement. in this case you should have said that labor saving devices are more blah blah blah.

then your heading should have been:
2. Some labor saving devices which are more troublesome than they are worth:
2.1
2.2

you have to guide the examiner. facilitate him. in your outline he has to do a lot of brain work. i hope i am able to convey my point.