More and more military engagements by the United Nations, is the world moving towards peace?

1: Introduction

a) Historical Background:Post World War II Scenario and creation of UN as custodian of Peace
b) Current Scenario: UN as a manipulative tool of Security Counsel
c) Thesis Statement: The world is absolutely not moving towards peace amid increasing UN military engagements

2: How UN Peace Keeping Missions have compromised the Peace?

a) Intervention in Congo led to escalation of war as Peace Keepers went beyond mandate
b) Failure of PK mission in Somalia
c) Provocative Offensive approach of UN Protection Force in Bosnia
d) Ukraine crisis: An omen for return of cold war and UN failure
e) Condoning the Palestine Crisis: Indication of UN's biased approach
f) Biased approach of UN Force in Sinai during Arab Israeli conflict prolonged the Yom Kipur war

3:Why has UN failed to establish peace via Military Engagements?

a) Non inclusiveness of General Assembly: Dominance of Security Counsel
b) Biased and prejudiced approach of UN
c) Excesses of PK missions led to escalation
d) Peace Keeping missions have been used as tools of aggression for vested interests
e) Complete silence of UN on Palestinian, Syrian and Afghanistan invasions and condoning destabilizing role of US and Russia

4: Conclusion

a) UN military engagements have escalated the conflicts rather mitigating
b) A neutral approach is essential for UN to play its role as a Peace Keeper
c) Equal participation and Inclusiveness of General Assembly is crucial for establishing peace.

1) Introduction

“ We the people of United nations affirm to prevent the scourge of war, which twice in our life time has brought untold sorrows to the mankind..”—UN Charter Preamble

Thesis: United Nations, despite its increasing international military engagements, has not been able to ensure peace. And has belied the essence of its charter.


2) Brief Overview of International military engagements by the United Nations

3) International military engagements by the United Nations and peace

4) How Despite increasing international Military engagements by the UN world is not moving towards peace

(4.1) Plight of Syrians continues unabated despite increasing international military engagements by the UN
(4.2) Yemen crisis continues to fester and the peace still remains elusive despite international military engagement by the UN
(4.3) China remains undeterred in South China Sea
(4.4) Despite UN’s involvement in Israel, Israel continues to expand its settlements in Palestine, which has resulted in intermittent clashes between the warring parties
(4.5) Other UN’s military engagements and their failure
(1) Peace keeping mission in South Sudan
(2) Peace keeping mission in Columbia
(3) Peace keeping mission in Central African Republics (CAR)

(5) Why despite UN’s increasing international military engagement world is not moving towards peace

(5.1) UNSC represents old geopolitical power balance, which affects its effectiveness
(5.2) Disunity among its veto-wielding Permanent members
(5.3) UN’s State-centric approach affects its ability to address contemporary challenges, which are largely intra-state
(5.4) Organizational inefficiency and Weak position of UN Secretary General

(6) How Can United nations be reformed to ensure peace in world

(1) Reforming the structure of UNSC in accordance with contemporary geopolitical realities
(2) Restrictions on the exercise of Veto
(3) Revamping the organizational structure to reclaim its efficiency
(4) De-politicization of the post of Secretary General

(7) Conclusion

Brother bilal, if you could kindly review this.

Asalamalikum sir ....you are doing a commendable job ...but sir in this essay ,there are lots of technical flaws .Sometimes I agreed and sometimes not because religious wars are connected with modern wars .In other words if we analyse modern wars ,they have been an outcome of the holy wars such as ,cultural dissimilarities ,ethnic conflicts ,racial discrimination ,extremism etc
further please elaborate very crucial topic
Regards

Being a minority is a fate no one wants. Can nationalism be really inclusive?

1: Introduction

a) Meaning of Nationalism: Inclusive and Exclusive
b) Reference of Asabia and Ibn e Khaldun's Views
c) Thesis Statement: Nationalism cannot be Inclusive.

2. Examples of Non-Inclusiveness of Nationalism

a) Apartheid: White and Black divide in South Africa
b) Socio-Economic backwardness of Blacks based on Racial Segregation in the US
c) Persecution of Rohingya minority in Myanmar
d) Indian claim on Kashmir yet non inclusiveness of Kashmiris in general Muslims in particular
e) Unequal treatment of non-Arabs in UAE and KSA

3: Why Nationalism cannot be Inclusive?

a) Economics and Financial gains rule the roost: Xenophobic Americans
b) Human nature is selfish so deprives the minorities
c) Electoral system of democracy itself excludes the minority
d) Nationalism to the extent of madness is detrimental to inclusiveness: German and Pan Arabism
e) Cultural contradictions promote exclusive nationalism
f) Geographic barriers

4. Conclusion

a) Nationalism cannot be inclusive
b) Racial, cultural, religious and socio-economic differences impede inclusiveness

__________________
Ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation.
But when love is one sided, holding off is no more an option.

Dear, there is nothing holy about cultural dissimilarity, ethnic conflict and racial discrimination! Holy word itself connotes something related to religious belief, so holy war means war fought on the basis of religious beliefs and differences on these. I see no flaws with it, let alone technical ones.
Regards.

Dear Uzair, you have followed the right pattern and I wish you luck for your results. However, in heading # 6 you are giving something extra which is not really warranted. Your attempt is worth appreciating.

__________________
Ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation.
But when love is one sided, holding off is no more an option.

[QUOTE=Bilal Hassan;1037968][COLOR="Blue"]Dear, there is nothing holy about cultural dissimilarity, ethnic conflict and racial discrimination! Holy word itself connotes something related to religious belief, so holy war means war fought on the basis of religious beliefs and differences on these. I see no flaws with it, let alone technical ones.
Regards.
Sir ,iam a bit confused in this topic .when i anaylze cultural dissimilarity ,religious differences ,language , racial discrimination etc come in the topic
In addition to , holy wars are always waged in the name of religion (now modern wars are also) .Everything that we have been observing has been the result of cultural differences .
i meant that modern wars and holy wars are similar
I have tried a lot to convince my self to give strong arguments .Sadly ,whenever i work on this topic ,i become disappointed.

Sir Are we required to write one paragraph for each point mentioned in the outline? For example, in the essay quoted above, you made a main heading No:1 Introduction and three subheadings of this main heading. Does this mean that we are supposed to write four paragraphs for the introduction?

Great work Mr Bilal Hassan. Well i have been reading your posts since 2012 and i found you quite keen and Talented. Well Congratulations on your success, though its too late but accept it.

__________________
Don't cry because its over.
Smile because it happened..

Dear Sir, The Thesis Statement of this essay should be (well, i think so) : Feminism is not really a third world issue , instead it is the issue of the whole globe.
My 2nd Q.: Is feminism an issue. I think it is not an issue but a movement, a campaign, for the equal rights of women which is categorically a good thing. its the concept of women empowerment thus how it can be an issue??

Any other member may also share his stance.
Regards