I'm new and want to learn how to make outline. Make outline for the following topics.
1. Is over population a human capital to proud of?
2. Too many of us are not living our dreams because we are living our fears.
3. Not economy but politics is a key to success.
4. Money makes the mare go.

if you are a beginner than i would suggest you to start with some easy topics.

thanks but someone recommend these topics to me

1. Introduction
2. Four Factors of Production (land, labor, capital, entrepreneurship)
3. Humans are the means and the end of all economic activity
4. The curse of Over-population
4.1 Stress on Limited Resources
4.2 Rising Unemployment
4.3 Environmental concerns
4.4 Rise in people living below the poverty line
4.5 Rise in crime rate and Violence
4.6 Child Labor and Female Rights
4.7 Lower per capita income
4.8 Increase in Urbanization
4.9 Disease and Epidemics
5. The blessing of a trained Human capital
5.1 Case studies of China, India and USA (all countries with large populations who have made the best of the situation)
6. Recommendations on how to create productive Human Capital
6.1 Mandatory Schooling up to a certain level
6.2 Technical and Vocational centers set-up
6.3 Economic assistance for the poor (case of Mexico Oportunidades/Prospera Program which gives the poor money but requires that they send their children to school or get clinical checkups)
6.4 Promotion of On-job training programs
6.5 Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) promotion
6.6 Government schemes to promote innovation and new ideas
6.7 Social Media campaigns aimed at inspiring people (especially Youth) and instilling qualities like dedication, innovation, and a love for learning.
6.8 Modern technology usage and training to raise productivity
6.9 Government policies and incentives aimed at promoting human-intensive production
7. Implications for Pakistan: Every person is an opportunity NOT a burden
8. Conclusion

thanks for sharing. keep the good work up.

thanks dear for hep me

Outline:

1. Introduction
2. Thesis statement

Main body:

3. What makes a proud human capital?
3.1)- Controlled population
3.2)- Better living standards
3.2)- Educated society
3.3)- Low crime rate
3.4)- No or less corruption
3.5)- National integration
3.6)- Meaningful contribution of men and women towards national progress

4. Over-population is not a human capital to be proud:
4.1)- More mouths-more consumption of limited resources
4.2)- Massive urbanisation
4.3)- Degradation of the environment
4.4)- Sense of deprivation due to acute poverty
4.5)- A continuous rift between haves and have-nots
4.6)- Increased child labour
4.7)- Prevalence of corruption and other social evils

5. Artificial intelligence: A blow to over-populated human capital

6. Over-population causes conflict and may resort to war:
6.1)- Ongoing conflict between Pakistan and India on water

7. Ways to make over-population a proud human capital:
7.1)- Provision of quality education for all
7.2)- Providing employment opportunities
7.3)- Abolishing child labour
7.4)- Empowering women

8. Examples of some countries which made their over-population a proud human capital:
9.1)- China-an economic giant and emerging power
9.2)- India- world's 2nd largest democracy with commendable achievements in cinema, medicine, and technology

9. Conclusion.

__________________
Nasru minal'lahi wa fat'hun qareeb

Your outline is good but there are some points which I have found necessary to mention:

The essay is argumentative. It should be reflected in your outline the stance you have taken either for or against. The curse of over-population gives the idea that you are talking about "effects of over-population." Also, your point no. 4.9 is irrelevant to the topic. Diseases/health issues have nothing to do with human capital. This point could be added to the "effects of population" type essays. The key word here is over-population vis-a-vis human capital.

Modern technology usage and training to raise productivity. The former part contradicts the latter one. The use of modern technology means machines which reduce human effort. In this way, the over-population will affect more because employment will be decreased. The former point should not be written.

Lastly, do not write long sentences in outline. Try to use shorter sentences.

Good luck.

__________________
Nasru minal'lahi wa fat'hun qareeb

Thank you for your detailed critique. I shall keep the pointers in mind. I wanted to take a more positive spin on the topic since it usually tends to become very gloom and doom. Yes, I fully agree over-population is a problem, as I attempted to convey in the curse of over-population portion, but its not going away anytime soon so lets try and make the best of it. The point 4.9 can be spun to fit the topic quite well. Over-population tends to congest in urban slums where due to the sheer press of people and lack of facilities epidemics are very prone to break out. Now you may ask what this has to do with a productive human capital? A healthy human is a good and productive capital. Disease kills human productivity and can slow the economy down quite drastically and stop us from reaching our full capacity of income and output. I do understand that it is quite a stretch to link this point with the topic and am grateful that you pointed out the weakness in my arguments. Thank you so much again.

God forbid brother! This happens only when zombies transmit their virus all over the region. Such a horrible and tragic incident not only kills human productivity but, with utter disappointment, perishes away the whole economy..

Had diseases killed "human productivity", then, in any case, we would not have seen China being the most populated country becoming an economic giant.

On a serious note, diseases do not affect people on such a massive scale so as to kill their productivity and slow down the economy. Above all, it does not suit the topic either. Additionally, diseases are caused by many factors; over-population is one of them and it does not affect that much on the productivity of the people. There is not a single real example as well to support this argument and I am sure that you won't be quoting "zombie apocalypse" in your essay to support the very argument.

What I have learned from my teachers and experience is that the outline is like the trailer of the movie. It should be self-explanatory. There are two targets in an essay: 1. Writing the relevant material. 2. Meeting the minimum threshold of 2500 words. The normal words per paragraph are 80-100. Keeping in view the time restraint, it is advisable to write those points which directly hit the bull's eye and appeal the examiner. Writing something vague and then trying to connect it with the topic will not only increase the normal length of the paragraph but also mar the cohesion as well. Anyways, you reserve the right to negate as everybody has its own perception and style of writing. My point was to emphasize the relevancy and elaborate the logical aspect of that point.

Good luck.

__________________
Nasru minal'lahi wa fat'hun qareeb