Great nations win without fighting

1-Intro
2-What is meaning of ‘win’
• Unmatched progress
3-Traditional way to win the race of supremacy
•Show of power through military
4-Emerging concept to win the race of supremacy
•Technological economic progress and public welfare
5-Which one is better way

i-Traditional way does not result long lasting win

ii-Traditional way is expensive both in terms of finance and human resources

iii-New way is more effective and result in long lasting win

6-Nations epitome of ‘win without fighting,
i-China
ii-Japan
iii-Recent policy shift of United States
•Iran Accord
•Pivot to Central Asia to secure resources of central Asia

7-How great nations win without fighting

i- Technological advancement

ii- Economic development

iii- Rule of law

iv- Public welfare

v- Scientific research and advancement

vi- Advancement in space

= Next war may be in space

viii- Education for all

8-Pakistan strategy to win revolves round India

•Formula of strategic depth

•Military centric policies

•Nourishing extremists

•Should change its policy from military centric to based on economic and public welfare

9-Concept oof win in Isalm

10-Conclusion
“ The highest art of war is to win without fighting”
blink

Nice attempt. It was not about development of nations. I think it was somewhat related to terrorism.

Almost wrong sketch of outline. First understand the indication of essay title then make a outline.

You have hit the topic with near perfection from the very beginning . I see this outline as a great example of improvisation of knowledge. You have proved your point that how great nations win without fighting. This was the requirement of this essay and i hope that you will be rewarded with good marks. Best wishes

__________________
Shoot for the moon, even if you miss, you will land among the stars.

Great nations win without fighting

1:Introduction

2:Historical background

The pact of medina
The treaty between England and scotland
The glaring example of china

3:Why great nations win without fighting?

Wrote 4-5 points in it

4:Advantages of wining without fighting

Sustainable peace
Tranquility and prevelance of brotherhood
Preservation of resources
I wrote 2 other points which I don't remember right now

5 -Disadvantages of using force

Strain on economy
Blood shed, hostility
Wrote 2-3 points which I can't recall

6:Conclusion


I tried to focus on the topic, no meandering.. Wrote approximately 1700 words..
I also wrote a paragraph on the current situation of Pakistan but didn't mention it in the outline.

I think point 1 is irevelant
I like Point 5 and is relevant to the topic

__________________
Don't lose hope. When the sun goes down, the stars come out.

Okay so you are telling us that economic stability can be achieved without fighting against the economic instability?

Great attempt
i also attempted in same way but your point 8 is change in which i added example of
1)Gandi how he won war with out war and got independence.
2)Quaid e Azam got independence for us with out war.
3) How Hitler became example for others who believe success is in war and diminished from world.

__________________
Don't lose hope. When the sun goes down, the stars come out.

hmmm nice attempt... But i guess some relative points are missing as evidences are not properly provided... it seems a little bit generalized.......

Seems nice attempt. But i think the outline is bit too long