Commendable effort.

If i really had to pick anything from what you wrote, it would be objection to 2d -i.e. lagging behind educationally, economically and socially -

The incompetent are not necessarily those who are financially weak or socially backward.

This line tarnishes the bright outline i guess.

@ Sawati,this deficiency ultimately leads to violence. we can consider the example of the landlords of trible areas, who being illiterate, do not let their surfs get education and seek a respectable job. heir incompetence towards their duties leads them to control others through violence. Economic weakness also provokes a person to find short cuts to get wealthy soon and he adopts illegal practices including robbery, mobile snatching, burglary etc. Increasing crime rate in the country speaks volumes about it. Those who lag behind socially include the chauvinistic male class of the society who do not adopt to the changing sociological conditions and keep on using unprovoked violence against female class. Criticism is more than welcome. regards.

In my point of view one can go against the topic. Like in this violence essay, one may say that violence is the last refuge of the oppressed. Because incompetent states, governments, feudal-lords, and international institutions have not been able to maintain the social justice. social injustice leads to oppression. the oppressed people start peaceful strikes. government, states, powerful ones-whom we call competent in reality-pay no heed to their cries. as a last resort, these oppressed people resort to violence.
social injustice in the form of feudal lords and vested interest groups using the political stand to their benefits like that of political structure in most of the third world countries. international institutions like the UNs doing social injustice at the international level making it the global phenomenon. Had the 9/11 attacks hit the lesser country, would the UNs still have adopted the anti-terrorism law, that allowed the use of force against terrorism for the first time and that too within the brief time of 3 weeks of 9/11? Probably not. this social injustice forces the oppressed nations and individuals to use violence as the last resort.
In 1914 a young man from Sarajevo, who killed the Archduke Ferdenand and his wife Sofie, which marked the start of a first war. In 1945 the USA bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima, which marked the end of the second world war, but instantly killing millions of people. Which of these were the acts of violence? Was an uneducated and oppressed young man from Sarajivo an incompetent or the educated and competent oppressor-the Archduke? the vagueness the statement is not that vague at all. Of course the young man does not have any other option and he lastly resorted to violence. The oppression in essence is violence itself. oppression can be made by competent and incompetent equally, that is, violence as first option. only The oppressed ones use it as a last resort.

"Kindly evaluate it" The topic is quiet tricky. it can be interpreted in different ways. Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. violence is not the last refuge of the incompetent. violence is last refuge of the competent. Is violence the last refuge of the incompetent?-if not then of whom? I attempted it in 2014 but its quite vague in nature.

Dear it is where they judge your negative and positive thinking..
Even if you have been victimized still you are not allowed to take law in your hands..so if an oppressed opts to violence he instead of taking refuge in law is taking law in its hands that will lead to further violence in form of retaliation. Violence whether from competent or incompetent, oppressed or dominant is discouraged. One has to trust in law and if law could not deliver then be patient that is what moral and islamic and soci norms are.

Further there were many other topics i this essaay paper that couod easily be attempted as negative.
Like women sportsmen as ambassadors..
Tell me .we are islamic country our no law allows our women to be without veil.i am not extremist but tell ke the turn out of a tennis player or cricket player. Is it by any mean allowed in islam. We are islamic democratic pakistan.
But if i go against this topic in essay paper i will be thought as extremist and radical and a person who denies women freedom. And will score zero or 5 i paper as is the case of many 2013 aspirants who still dont understand what exactly went wrong in their papers.Truely i am not.i am in complete favour of women freedom but staying within the restrictions of islamic laws..

Of course one is not allowed to take law in his hands but still he takes it in his hands as a last resort. that is actually my point. in the topic, the main thing is violence being the last resort. now that is not necessary that who will be that person. competent use it as first resort. incompetent powerful one take it as first resort. the only one left are the oppressed ones. only oppressed ones use it as a last resort.

Once a quote is said,it is universal it does not fit to any particular society. This is quote of an eminent scholar. Now the examples that you are giving belongs to pakistani society only.where this feudal class exist. In europe and other countries violence is the least attempted thing. People have got fear of law there .no feudal or competent thinks of doing injustice to others or oppressed. But incompetent (blacks)does so...

dear in European countries there is social justice within their states. that is not the case with third world countries. where feudals, politicians, vested interest groups do violence at first place and the oppressed ones use it afterwards as a last resort.

dear whatsoever it is, my point is to know whether one can go against the topic, in a way that i go, if he can justify.

This is, actually, what i want to emphasize.if we go against a statement then we have restricted ourselves to thirld world countries only, while in statement there was not included word pakistan or india etc..
I am sorry if you have gone against the statement. But i tell you one thing and this is what i have learnt in different competitive exams that key to success is be different. This is human psychy that we pay mire attention to different.
I am sure he would have read complete of your essay and if your logics are convincing then you stand a very good chance of passing the exam
Wish you good luck.

Violence is defined by the World Health Organization as "the intentional use of physical force or power, threatened or actual, against oneself, another person, or against a group or community, which either results in or has a high likelihood of resulting in injury, death, psychological harm, maldevelopment, or deprivation", now by looking into this definition one can differentiate different types of violence and their causes. Ultimately the underlying reason would be incompetence of the individual or group of people.
Some gentlemen are arguing that competent people might use power, which ultimately means that they are incompetent in that specific area of interest to use diologue, logic or wisdom to achieve their objectives.In other words, incompetence is not a degree one once get, would not show incompetence ever.
My point here is, if you are arguing to prove this quotation wrong, it would be no more than verbal jugglery and losing your points ultimately. The examiner has put this type of title intentionally, to check how much are you analytical and how you comprehend. one can not just go against the title always.
This is my opinion, you can criticize it.

• intro.
• violence is the last refugee of incompetence how?
• by greed to achieve
• by fraud to achieve
• by deceit to achieve
• by oppression to achieve something how?
• 1 through mass killing
• 2 deride people of their rights
• 3 become callous
• 3 when violence become last refugee of incompetence?
• 1 when one survival is possible through ignoble means
• 2 when one achieve prominant position through ignoble means
• 4 hence becomes violence is the last refugee of incompetence
• examples
• conclusion

• intro.
• violence is the last refuge of incompetance how?
• when done mentally how?
• through blame games
• through conspiracy theories
• 2 when done through immoral means how?
  • 1 through hypocricy
  • 2 vindictiveness
  • 3 lies
  • 4deciet
  • 5 greed
  • 3 when done physically how?
  • 1mass killing of innocent to protect and enhance your or other motives
  • 2 through fights either through tit for tit or to prove your prominance
  • when done spirtually.how?
  • to save idealogy of
  • to impose idealogy of deliberately.
  • to crush idealogy
  • 3 violence becomes last refuge of only incompetence why not competance?
  • because it shows morall corruption
  • mental ignorance and extremism
  • physically false show off pride of strength
  • or fear of weakness
  • and spiritual hollowness and retardedness
  • 5 hence violence is the last refuge of incompetence
  • 6 conclusion- end

Comment please..the numbering looks somewhat haphazad but I couldn't edit it because 10 minutes were over to edit it