Reasons that caused Pak Army to get involved in politics repeatedly?
 

plz post resons that caused pak army plunging into politics again and again(only points)

1. Inefficiency of Politicians.
2. Inability to make Constitution.
3. East Pakistan Anarchy
4. International Compulsions
above all
5. Pakistan aor Aziz Ham Watanon ka tahafuz.

Please do correct, if needed.

reasons for continuous involvement of Army...
 

First of all Pakistan is security state,and there is every reason to believe that army should be strong enough to reply the aggression all the time hovering around us,both outside and inside.Also the army is only institution that proved the capacity to deliver in time of both natural and man made calamities.We have developed a psyche to see toward army in case when democratic dispensation fail.But in such case we,the poor and middle,only contribute to army involvement only to the extent that we only want the army in place,but we can not do that.But here on creation of such situation,the rival party help the army to take over.we can see many such example.
Since army is strong ad organised,so most of the time it prove right to the ocassion.Army goes well so far it is not involved in rotten game of politics(i only refer the rotten game to pak politics),it is also difficult for army to satisfy people,and it is kicked away by people.Believe me if army does not involve in politics,we pakistani...?(at least me):onesec may bear whole life.

1.[INDENT][/INDENT]Politicians create the space very first time when Field Marshal Ayub Khan was appointed as Defense Minister.

2.[INDENT][/INDENT]Inability and Failure of Political System and politicians

3.[INDENT][/INDENT]Strong position of Army due to our Geo Political Position

4.[INDENT][/INDENT]Encouragement from super power as they could easily deal with a single person instead of an elected representatives

5.[INDENT][/INDENT]Invitation from the Politicians and public to interfere

My point of view
 

"The lowest depth to which a state can fall herself is dictatorship;dictatorship is followed only by foreign despot".
Pluto (Republic) 428 BC,Athens,Greece

Dear Folks,

The assertion that Pakistan is a security state which necessitates to have a "strong" army is undoubted.But would anybody bother to relate the criteria of a strong army.
A strong army is one which is professionally and technically strong.Army can maintain its strength as long as it refrains from unprofessional affairs.A strong army is never a political force which dictates the politics of country.Army indulgence in politics and civil organizations only weakens it from within.Political indulgence decays and degenerates army as an instituition.
Pakistan is a security state and so are all world major powers.USA is now spending hefty amounts on her security but US army never indulged in Politics.
The biggest motivation of Pak Army indulgence in politics is lust orf power.Security reasons,corrupt politicians,so called anarchy of East Pakistan are lies which have been fabricated to befool the people.
East Pak debacle and loss of Siachin are sorrow tales of army failure and decaying.Pakistan would not have suffered from Dacca fall if a politician would have ruled us instead of Ayub.Politics desperately requires vision,foresightedness and shrewedness are qualities which generals are always wanting.

"Coup-gemony (military coup) and hegemony are two sides of same imperialistic coins but coup-gemony is more fatal than hegemony as coup-gemony provides the bridge over which hegemony walks in."
Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (If I am assasinated),Death Cell,Rawalpindi,1978.