Saturday, April 20, 2024
05:00 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Compulsory Subjects > Pakistan Affairs

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Thursday, November 23, 2006
Naseer Ahmed Chandio's Avatar
39th CTP (OMG)
CSP Medal: Awarded to those Members of the forum who are serving CSP Officers - Issue reason: CE 2010 Merit 546
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Karachi
Posts: 134
Thanks: 1
Thanked 176 Times in 44 Posts
Naseer Ahmed Chandio is on a distinguished road
Arrow The Women’s Protection Bill

The Women’s Protection Bill
The Problem
The Hudood (Enforcement of Zina) Ordinance, 1979 has been the single most critiqued and controversial law in Pakistan’s history
  • Two basic problems:
The Zina Ordinance silenced and intimidated victims of rape
      • Women who alleged and then failed to prove rape charges were deemed to have confessed to zina (fornication)
      • Rape victims preferred to keep quiet rather than face fresh trauma
      • Classic case was of blind girl who was convicted of fornication after she failed to identify her attacker
    • The Zina Ordinance permitted the gross abuse of divorced women
      • Zina (fornication) defined as sex with any person not your “lawful” spouse
      • Across Pakistan, formalities regarding divorce are little known and rarely followed
        • i.e. husband will pronounce talaq three times and send wife home
        • Legally, divorce requires certificate of confirmation, which few people know (especially in rural areas)
        • Often when women remarried, first husband would file fornication charges against ex-wife and second husband
      • Because offence of zina was cognizable, any report to a police station would result in an FIR being filed;
        • since bail was very difficult to obtain in zina case, many women spent years in jail on trumped up charges of zina

The reason for the problems
  • Zina Ordinance mixed Quranic punishments (hadd) with punishments under non-Quranic laws (tazir)
    • Hadd punishments are different from tazir punishments
    • Evidentiary requirements of hadd punishments are different
      • i.e. hadd punishments require evidence of four eye witnesses
      • tazir punishments can be based on the testimony of one person alone
  • Zina Ordinance provided hadd punishments for some crimes which are not defined in the Quran
    • E.g., Zina Ordinance provided a hadd punishment for rape (Zina bil jabr) even though there is punishment specified in the Quran for rape
  • Judges under Zina Ordinance took a very broad view of what constituted a “confession”
o
      • i.e. pregnancy of an unmarried women deemed to be a “confession” of fornication
  • Fornication (zina) was defined as a non-bailable crime
    • Since punishment for zina was theoretically death, zina fell with the special range of cases in which it was very difficult to get bail

The Women’s Protection Act: the solution to the Zina Ordinance’s problems
  • Women’s Protection Act therefore does five main things:
    • Zina Ordinance limited to cover only hadd punishments, not tazir punishments
      • i.e. Hudood Ordinance will no longer provide any tazir punishment for fornication
      • if a person cannot meet evidentiary requirements of hadd punishment (i.e. four eyewitnesses) then accused will be set free

·
    • Zina Ordinance limited to exclude all those punishments not specified in the Quran itself
      • i.e. no punishment in Quran specified for crime of rape
      • rape therefore now defined as a crime under Pakistan Penal Code (just like murder and theft)
    • All crimes whose punishment is not specified by the Quran itself now covered by the Pakistan Penal Code
      • Means these crimes can be tried under the normal criminal laws, subject to normal rules of procedure and evidence
    • Procedural safeguards introduced to protect women
      • In order to lodge complaint, complainant must take four eye-witnesses to a sessions judge
      • Judge must ensure that witnesses meet Islamic standards of moral probity
      • If Judge believes that prima facie case is made out, then he issues a summons (not a warrant)
      • If Judge does not believe the complainant, then the complainant and all four alleged witnesses can be punished with a sentence of 80 lashes for making a false accusation of zina
      • The term confession has now been defined to mean an actual confession in court before a judge a
    • Zina defined as a “bailable” crime
      • Bailable means bailable as of right
      • In practical terms, unless convicted, no woman will spend time in jail on zina charges

What the Bill does not do
  • The Bill does not change the hadd punishment for Zina
  • The Bill does not change the hadd punishment for any Qazf
  • The Bill does not change the Quranic punishment for any crime
    • It is common ground between religious scholars from all schools that there is no punishment specified in the Quran for rape
    • Thus, the only punishment for rape is tazir punishment (i.e. that under man-made law)
    • The urdu translation of the Pakistan Penal Code is “taziraat e Pakistan
    • Tazir” is a generic word, not a word specific to Islamic law

Other things the bill does and why
  • Age of consent for women has been defined as 16 years
    • As per existing law, minimum age of marriage for women is 16 years
  • Crime of attempt and abetment have been removed from Zina Ordinance
    • These crimes are not defined in the Quran itself
  • Punishment for gang rape now includes imprisonment for life as well as death
    • When death was the only punishment, judges often used to acquit rather than give such a drastic penalty

Common Misperceptions about the Bill
  • The bill will not lead to widespread immorality or indecency
    • Prior to 1979, public indecency was not a major problem
    • No reason why returning the law to pre-1979 status will cause a collapse in public morality

Why are some groups not supporting the Bill and why they are wrong
  • Some groups want a complete repeal and nothing less
    • Politics is the art of the possible
    • Original draft of the bill was a pure repeal but that is politically impossible
    • Liberals cannot be so blind as to oppose a bill just because it is not perfect
    • In the short run, this is the best chance of negating a law which has destroyed the lives of many women
  • Some groups don’t want to support anything done by a military dictator
    • To repeat, politics is the art of the possible
    • What counts are the lives of those ordinary people which will otherwise be ruined by the corrupt administration of a deeply flawed law
  • Some groups see their power base disappearing
    • The mullahs thrive on fear and fanaticism
    • Educated and free women are the best defence a society has against ignorance and intolerance
__________________
["Satisfaction is death of Struggle"]
[Naseer Ahmed Chandio]
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Naseer Ahmed Chandio For This Useful Post:
DIA SHAH (Friday, October 29, 2010)
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Constitutional Law: SELECTED CONSTITUTIONS OF THE WORLD Ahmed Ali Shah Constitutional Law 17 Monday, May 09, 2011 10:01 PM
Bill Gates Invincible General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 1 Sunday, May 18, 2008 10:39 PM
Legislative Assembly of Sind under Government of India Act 1935. Waqar Abro General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests 2 Thursday, August 02, 2007 06:53 PM
Women’s Movement in South Asia Muhammad Haseeb Khalid News & Articles 0 Monday, December 11, 2006 04:32 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.