This forum should be open for all.If the administratotrs deem anything unparliamentary then they shud info the concerned person to abide by the rules rather than banning him/her straught away.Banning Sonia Hameed is not a commendable step u have taken.Hope u will revise ur decision in this regard.

AoA,
Ms. Sonia has not been banned, she's under moderation only (Her posts will be visible to others after admin's approval). And this step has been taken in order to avoid any such post which hits other members.


Regards

__________________
||||||||||||||||||||50% Complete

after going thru all the posts, i think that moderation imposed on ms. sonia is totally unjustified .
and btw, where is my medal ? i got audit n accounts.

salam dear,

let me tel u mr.noman tht u cant b given medal of csscoz apka dil nae chata join karny ko...............its for pure csp..................un logo k lye nae jo kabi kehty hy join karna hy kabi kehty hy nae join karna..................i will c u .............apka ik dafa per pannel intervw hoga.........then v would deciede abuot ur fattttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt.


thnks

aamer khattak

__________________
[FONT="Comic Sans MS"]Engineer Aamer Khattak[/FONT]

Mr. Nauman, the posts you've come across contain the edited material. If you clearly look at them you'll find each and every post edited. She has been requested not to hit members' reputation as well, but she continued the same practice, and hence survellience imposed on her is justified.

You've been awarded the medal, Congarts!

Regards

__________________
||||||||||||||||||||50% Complete

thanks for the medal.

khattak sahib aik dafa doobara mulakaat tow kerain na zara.

daikh loon ga aap ko.

salam dear,

hows life and wht about ur joiningdont wory i wll visit u just to bring that medle backwhich has been awarded to u by this forum..................coz ist u have to clearly affiliate ur self wid civil service or wid telecome sector...........
IHAVE GIVEN NOTICE TO MY COMPANY AND WILL CELEBRATE MY INDEPENDECE ON 14TH OF AUGUST FROM TELECOME SECTOR
FOR RESPONSIBLES OF THIS FORUM..........................PLZ DONT WORY FOR UR MEDLE HOPE V WOULD NOT LOOOOOOOOOOOOOS IT.


THNKS
AAMER KHATTAK

__________________
[FONT="Comic Sans MS"]Engineer Aamer Khattak[/FONT]

"For Mr.Waheed: I am thankful to u for ur all words and posting my words.

For Mr. Nauman, I am thnksful to u for ur words and ur right judgment that there was nothing wrong in my postings. U r normal person with correct judgment.

For Qurat: I donot know what is ur contribution to this valuable FOrum for new enterants of CSS, but one thing seems to be quite starange in ur posting in reply to Mr. Nauman i.e, " If you clearly look at them you'll find each and every post edited.""
It gives me impression that u have lesser exposure of outer world where people enjoy Freedom of expression. Lesser said, better u get my point. I neither abused anyone nor i posted obsecne material which was irritating u. In fact, my postings were based on princiles of critical evaluation and replying them accordingly.. So, there we no reson to keep me "under moderation" of ur "Excellence". Hope u will not dare to edit the psoting of mr. waheed!!!! lolzzzz

Regards
Sonia Hameed"
( i think tht ban on free thinkers like Ms Sonia is highly unjustified)

Miss Quratulain,

It is good to know that there is such strict watch going over this useful forum. That makes it constructive while maintaining its vitality.

However for that precise reason, namely vitality, I would rather favour Ms. Sonia to be given full membership rights again.

I agree with you that she tends to go subjective but let it be handled by individuals concerned as she was definitely not posting any obscenity.

Regards

One real positive thing about Miss Sonia is that she struggles for what she considers right. It is also true that she can make show of her exposure of outer world, which other members do not have (in her judgment). Since I have gone through some of the non-edited posts, so I can confirm that (at least in those posts which I had seen) those posts were neither 'abusive' for anyone and nor were 'irritatiting' specifically for Miss Qurat. But those posts were really 'insulting' for some of the senior members and were not based on the priciples of critical evaluation. Those posts were 'critical' but without any evaluation.

The team of administrators and moderators of this forum gives high value to freedom of expression and really appreciates critical analysis and evaluation. But critical minded persons should have right concept of the boundaries and limits of right critical evaluation. In one of her 'non-edited' post, Miss Sonia's 'critical evaluation' was also logically inaccurate. I cannot share it because it was really insulting for a senior member. So in my assessment, those posts were rightly edited by concerned mods. I hope that admins would soon lift the 'under moderation' status and we shall get all the benefits of right critical evaluations from the side of highly competent member Miss Sonia.

Regards!

__________________
Where is the SIGNATURE....????