Indo-Pak History:again worst result

[Arthur]

Indo-pakistan History has again given least score:

CSS-2010
Indo-pak I 36
Indo-Pak II 37

CSS-2011
Indo-pak I 40
Indo-Pak II 23

Geography,psychology,political science,Accounting,etc have given good marks.

[manahill]

what is wrong with indopak.i think i performed very well and i got only 37 in paper a and 57 in paper b

[Amigo]

Well I am also shocked at the result of Indo Pak because I was hoping much better results this time. I have an idea to see why low score. If you guys can post an outline of only one question you attempted in the paper which you think was best attempted, all of us can then discuss ke what went wrong. Outline can be in headings/pointers, no need to write detailed one. This is just an idea, if somebody has a better plan then please come forward.

P.S. I didn't appear in 2011. But I have thorough preparation of Indo Pak right now.

[Gulrukh]

dammit!!!.....What's the problem with this subject...I just fail to understand..why we are sacrificed on the altar of Indo Pak history each time we go for it !!!

[manahill]

i performed very badly in islamyat and i was 80% sure i had failed the subject but i got 59 marks in it.i was 100% sure i'd get 65 marks in indopak paper a but i got only 37.

fpsc's just discouraging students not to opt indopak.thats all.

[shanrafiq]

I have been going through the DMC's of failed candidates and the result of Indo Pak is a mixed one. Some people managed to get 120 and some people fared really badly.

[The Manager]

Originally Posted by manahill

i performed very badly in islamyat and i was 80% sure i had failed the subject but i got 59 marks in it.i was 100% sure i'd get 65 marks in indopak paper a but i got only 37.

fpsc's just discouraging students not to opt indopak.thats all.

I second u in this matter.

[Amigo]

Originally Posted by manahill

i performed very badly in islamyat and i was 80% sure i had failed the subject but i got 59 marks in it.i was 100% sure i'd get 65 marks in indopak paper a but i got only 37.

fpsc's just discouraging students not to opt indopak.thats all.

What has FPSC to earn from it? I mean why would they "discourage" a particular subject so that candidates opt for another which can be "encouraged"?
Seriously aap laug apney kisi aik sawal ki outline dain to sahi, abhi pata chal jata hai ke FPSC marks waqai galat de rahi hai ya we people are unable to produce what is required.

Originally Posted by shanrafiq

I have been going through the DMC's of failed candidates and the result of Indo Pak is a mixed one. Some people managed to get 120 and some people fared really badly.

I have only seen Sadia Shafiq- a member here- scoring above 120 warna to es dafa ragra phair diya hai Indo Pak ne 2010 ki tarah
Can you please tell some other DMCs showing a trend of "mixed result"?

[shanrafiq]

roll No 8382 scored 129
Abdul Wahab scored 115
another guy scored 63 + 59 and he states that he did not attempt one question

[The Manager]

I think its not because of the subject but our own analytical skills and comprehension of the questions. I also got 47 & 39. Blaming my ownself because my approach was not that good and to the point.