| |
 |
 |
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
10:32 PM (GMT +5) |
|
|
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lahore, Sargodha
Posts: 217
Thanks: 41
Thanked 186 Times in 102 Posts
|
|
It is so frustrating to see this kind of procedure. The most competitive exam of the country is no more a competition in truest sense. Competition means those who perform well should earn the fruits. CSS has been made more of a system of quotas, the fact that one is born in a province provides him with a handicap or puts him at a natural advantage. How is it justified to have people at the bottom of list be allocated and people who have performed much better be sitting empty handed.
Serious thought is required over the matter....
__________________
*Whirling Dervaish*
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to hassanshariq For This Useful Post:
|
|
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
|
|
40th CTP (MLCG)
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
Posts: 66
Thanks: 74
Thanked 94 Times in 26 Posts
|
|
59 already in Pakistan Customs, so his group didn't improve and he was not allocated seat.
|
Thursday, July 12, 2012
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 53
Thanks: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xeric
Based on your comments above-mentioned allocation may be treated correct. However, there are certain candidates Merit. No. 59, 105, 112, 131 and 133 who are not allocated may be due to group preferences by mentioning only top of the groups.
|
Yes you are right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hassanshariq
It is so frustrating to see this kind of procedure. The most competitive exam of the country is no more a competition in truest sense. Competition means those who perform well should earn the fruits. CSS has been made more of a system of quotas, the fact that one is born in a province provides him with a handicap or puts him at a natural advantage. How is it justified to have people at the bottom of list be allocated and people who have performed much better be sitting empty handed.
Serious thought is required over the matter....
|
Yes i also agree. Its sheer injustice with the potential candidates.
Thats totally my opinion. No offence intended
|
Thursday, July 12, 2012
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 37
Thanks: 12
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
salam,i am confused after seeing the name of candidates that have been allocated on punjab minority quota i.e. Khurram shehzad,talha bin khalid,zunera noor.Their names seem like muslim's.what is this??
|
Thursday, July 12, 2012
|
|
40th CTP (DMG)
|
|
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Gujranwala
Posts: 15
Thanks: 82
Thanked 55 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emaan zia
salam,i am confused after seeing the name of candidates that have been allocated on punjab minority quota i.e. Khurram shehzad,talha bin khalid,zunera noor.Their names seem like muslim's.what is this??
|
They might be qadiyani.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to M Umair Abdul Khaliq For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thursday, July 12, 2012
|
 |
40th CTP (OMG)
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ali Pur Chattha-Gujranwala, STI Islamabad
Posts: 601
Thanks: 700
Thanked 412 Times in 269 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emaan zia
salam,i am confused after seeing the name of candidates that have been allocated on punjab minority quota i.e. Khurram shehzad,talha bin khalid,zunera noor.Their names seem like muslim's.what is this??
|
I think they belong to Ahmadi community, declared non Muslims by constitution of Pakistan.
__________________
Don't wait, feel happiness right at the moment as wait will never end.
|
Thursday, July 12, 2012
|
 |
34th Commons (PAAS)
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 171
Thanks: 7
Thanked 162 Times in 80 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sarfaraz shami
I think they belong to Ahmadi community, declared non Muslims by constitution of Pakistan.
|
So is it a deliberate attempt to increase qadiyanis' ratio in civil services??
is it not, in a sense, violation of article 25?
__________________
Chaudhry Nauman Zafar
Whatever human mind can believe or conceive, it can achieve.
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nauman For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thursday, July 12, 2012
|
|
40th CTP (OMG)
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Ali Pur Chattha-Gujranwala, STI Islamabad
Posts: 601
Thanks: 700
Thanked 412 Times in 269 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nauman
So is it a deliberate attempt to increase qadiyanis' ratio in civil services??
is it not, in a sense, violation of article 25?
|
5 % quota of minorities is totally unjust, CE-2013 advertisement prescribed 5 % quota, while ratio of non muslims is from 2 to 2.5 %. Among these minorities Ahmadi's are well off & educated. So ultimately most seats on minority quota will be captured by Ahmadi,s, which has negligible portion in population percentage.
__________________
Don't wait, feel happiness right at the moment as wait will never end.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sarfaraz shami For This Useful Post:
|
locong (Tuesday, September 25, 2012) |
Thursday, July 12, 2012
|
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 37
Thanks: 12
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
yes.I think so, you are right.They might be belonging to ahmadi community.But sir nauman,it is right of any pakistani citizen to join civil service irrespective of the ethnic or religious group one belongs to.
Rest Allah knows better.
Anyways,thanks for removing my confusion
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Emaan zia For This Useful Post:
|
|
Friday, July 13, 2012
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rawalpindi
Posts: 239
Thanks: 333
Thanked 229 Times in 113 Posts
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hassanshariq
The women seats have been filled already. 11 seats reserved for them have been filled!!! how come then in OMG after 134 merit number all the other are girls? they are from merit number 153-195. There are a large number of male candidates in that range from Punjab, how have they not been allocated and girls with lower merit order number have been allocated????
|
You are right brother.I am one such person who stands at 161 in open and could not secure allocation.Only 7 marks deprived me from allocation.We are a toy in the hands of destiny which plays very serious comedy with us.
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mechrose37 For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
Similar Threads
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Just and unjust: A prisoner’s thesis
|
Call for Change |
The Express Tribune |
0 |
Saturday, September 03, 2011 12:55 PM |
|
Delay in allocations 2009 on account of ongoing court case
|
mustafaiqbal |
CSS 2009 Exam |
107 |
Wednesday, October 27, 2010 11:26 AM |
|
Report of Technical Commitee on Water Resources
|
Yasir Hayat Khan |
General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests |
0 |
Monday, January 16, 2006 01:53 AM |
|
Technical Report on water resources
|
A Soul |
Pakistan Affairs |
2 |
Wednesday, December 28, 2005 09:45 PM |
|
|
Facebook
del.icio.us
Google
Digg
StumbleUpon
