#101
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
you should immediately go to fpsc and give a representation regarding this issue as rules were same in CE-2012 and CE-2013 both ! and it would be much better if you give reference of any other case of this kind dealt by FPSC prior to this ! goodluck ! |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ghulam Farid Asad For This Useful Post: | ||
izhar ahmad (Friday, November 29, 2013), The Shah Ends (Friday, November 29, 2013) |
#102
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And yes for the disjunctive statement to be True when at least one of disjuncts' Truth value is true, row 2 is valid.
__________________
Ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation. But when love is one sided, holding off is no more an option. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Bilal Hassan For This Useful Post: | ||
bear (Sunday, December 01, 2013) |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
any progress???
nate, any progress in your case???
|
#105
|
||||
|
||||
Response of Fpsc regarding the case
|
#106
|
|||
|
|||
please reply seniors i need help
Please specify if optional subjects with 200 marks have 33% minimum threshold or is it compulsory to secure 33 marks in both papers
For example if i attempt psychology which is 200 marks subject and i secure this result; paper 1 : 5 Paper 2 : 70 so what is the result? its 35% or fail? Am i considered pass or fail?? I am really confused please help?? i even called fpsc but they could not answer my question. please specify what is the rule because according to my understanding it must be a subject not an individual paper. ?? am i correct? |
#108
|
||||
|
||||
There is only one way of receiving the justice through court. The Fpsc will unhear your voice to hide there innocence regarding the result as every css competent know rules of 2012 exam were not followed so what happened at 2013.
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
Many aspirant those have more than 600 marks in aggregate failed in CSS-2013 written examination just because of replacement of 'or' with " ," (comma) in CSS-2013 rules.
CSS-2013 - RULE ABOUT QUALIFYING MARKS The Commission with prior approval of the Government may fix qualifying marks in any or all of the subjects of the examination but a candidate who fails to secure at least 40% marks in any compulsory subject, 33% marks in any of the optional subjects , 50% marks in the Aggregate and 100 marks at the Viva Voce, will be considered to have failed and will not be eligible for appointment. CSS-2012 - RULE ABOUT QUALIFYING MARKS The Commission with prior approval of the Government may fix qualifying marks in any or all of the subjects of the examination but a candidate who fails to secure at least 40% marks in any compulsory subject, 33% marks in any of the optional subjects or50% marks in the Aggregate and 100 marks at the Viva Voce, will be considered to have failed and will not be eligible for appointment. Last edited by Arain007; Sunday, April 20, 2014 at 09:41 AM. Reason: avoid use of red font |
#110
|
||||
|
||||
Ahan so you think Fps obey the rules but I totally disagree. What is your opinion regarding the below statements.
CSS-2013 - RULE ABOUT QUALIFYING MARKS The Commission with prior approval of the Government may fix qualifying marks in any or all of the subjects of the examination but a candidate who fails to secure at least 40% marks in any compulsory subject, 33% marks in any of the optional subjects , 50% marks in the Aggregate and 100 marks at the Viva Vice, will be considered to have failed and will not be eligible for appointment. CSS-2008 - RULE ABOUT QUALIFYING MARKS The Commission with prior approval of the Government may fix qualifying marks in any or all of the subjects of the examination but a candidate who fails to secure at least 40% marks in any compulsory subject, 33% marks in any of the optional subjects , 50% marks in the Aggregate and 100 marks at the Viva Vice, will be considered to have failed and will not be eligible for appointment. Well that's strange 2008 and 2013 are same so why AMMARh MUBARIK 2008 got selected yet she was failed in optional. I'm waiting for some one to prove me wrong. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Asma Jilani ---- Vs---- Govt. of the Punjab | sajidnuml | Constitutional Law | 5 | Saturday, November 11, 2017 06:00 PM |
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2009 | Last Island | Subject Analysis | 3 | Tuesday, May 29, 2012 11:44 AM |
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2007 | Last Island | Subject Analysis | 15 | Tuesday, February 16, 2010 03:51 AM |
Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) | Muhammad Adnan | General Knowledge, Quizzes, IQ Tests | 0 | Thursday, December 01, 2005 12:50 PM |