|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Very sad, i think FPSC just want to minimize the number of candidates by any means.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Very good decision by FPSC.Because many experienced persons (including working csps) deliberately selected wrong combination to decide optionals after the result of CE 2013. Good step by FPSC.
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
@silentstar
Dear Friend!
Though the decision may seems to you as a rude one but when you put your signature on the form you consent to the rules and regulations so better you relax than blaming FPSC. Moreover, a representative of the FPSC once told me that we are spending some 200k on each candidate so we have to adopt strictness for the removal of non-serious candidate so this may be a part of their this strategy. But I'm still wondering that how come a person who's studied for one long year for appearing in CSS and haven't read the instruction for filling the optional subjects part of the application form. Anyhow, better luck next time.
__________________
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal; it is the courage to continue that counts" (Winston Churchill) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2011 | Last Island | Subject Analysis | 2 | Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:03 AM |
rejected candidates of kpk pms | imran bakht | KPKPMS | 6 | Sunday, November 21, 2010 07:49 PM |