Thursday, April 25, 2024
01:15 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets > CSS News

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old Sunday, December 15, 2013
imbindas's Avatar
Senior Member
Medal of Appreciation: Awarded to appreciate member's contribution on forum. (Academic and professional achievements do not make you eligible for this medal) - Issue reason:
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Islamabad
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 448
Thanked 851 Times in 551 Posts
imbindas is a glorious beacon of lightimbindas is a glorious beacon of lightimbindas is a glorious beacon of lightimbindas is a glorious beacon of lightimbindas is a glorious beacon of lightimbindas is a glorious beacon of light
Default CSS examinations: Wheels that run Pakistan coming to a halt

ISLAMABAD:

Since colonial times, the civil service has retained the prestige that comes with joining the country’s bureaucratic machine, which is why thousands of Pakistanis apply to join the civil service every year.

Worryingly, however, the annual percentage of successful candidates who take the Central Superior Services (CSS) exam has been decreasing, according to the annual reports of the Federal Public Service Commission (FPSC) from 2002 to 2013.

The passing percentage of the candidates in the written examination was 30% in 2002. In 2013 that figure has plummeted to a barely believable 2.09%.

According to the FPSC’s 2012 annual report given to Parliament last week, the government could only fill 240 out of a possible 285 positions that were open to candidates. There were not enough qualified and eligible candidates to fill out the remaining 45 positions, the report said. This is not new either. There were 66 vacancies after the 2010 CSS exam.

The annual reports from 2010 and 2011 compiled by the FPSC have been documenting the trend, but 2013 has hit a new low.

This year, a total number of 15,998 had applied for the CSS. Out of the 11,406 who actually gave the exam, only 238 passed the first phase. Out of total 238, 172 were male and 66 female.

Those who passed the written part of the examination will have to undergo further tests, including a medical examination, a psychological assessment and Viva Voce, an oral examination. An FPSC official predicted that many more candidates may still be disqualified after further tests.

According to the 2012 annual report, 13,071 candidates applied for the CSS exam while 9,063 appeared for it. Only 786 eventually qualified, with a lopsided gender divide, as 604 men qualified, and only 179 women.

Provincial Disparities

There are, of course, systemic reasons for the atrophying results. Provincial disparity, present in almost all human development indices in Pakistan including education, health and income, is also present in the CSS examination process. Over the years, candidates from Sindh, and Karachi in particular have been decreasing, leaving more and more positions vacant.

In 2010 and 2011, there were 35 and 21 unfilled positions from the Urban Sindh quota respectively, as fewer candidates apply for the exam, preferring potentially higher pay in the private sector.

With an already Punjab-heavy quota of 50%, a drop in candidates from Sindh carries a higher potential for disagreement between the provinces. Given that the civil service defines itself as “the wheels on which the engine of the state has to move,” lately it seems like the wheels are coming off.

In order to mitigate the crisis, the FPSC has been conducting a series of career counselling seminars, trying to raise the profile of the civil service, with the aim of increasing the number of applications. Rana Bhagwandas, chairman of the FPSC, hopes for a fresh education policy to complement the FPSC’s effort to broaden recruitment.

Essay writing

24%
passed
out of
9,062
candidates.

31 got
above
60%
marks

Problematic Academic Trends

Observations from 2011 highlighted problematic trends within the examination process, the most apparent of which is the low quality of writing – a factor that has affected performances in all subjects. That is most evident in the result for the essay writing exam: out of 9,062 candidates only 24% passed, out of which only 31 candidates got above 60%. But inferior writing skills have adversely affected results in all subjects.

Second, candidates’ inclination to rote-learn has also compromised their analytical skills, required for effectively every subject in the examination. Ready-made answers have hardly been adequate in answering questions that require serious inquiry, knowledge and analysis. Such exercise was particularly problematic in the South Asian History and Public Administration sections of the exam.

Lastly, English language skills have also been poor across the board, hampering candidates’ ability to answer questions effectively.

In Islamic Studies, the majority of candidates could not attempt the questions regarding Women and Islam, and had failed to adequately consider contemporary issues regarding the veil and secularism in society. According to the report, papers on Islamic history and culture were also mediocre, with only a superficial understanding of the subject demonstrated. The highest percentage attained in Part 1 was 60%. In Islamic jurisprudence, students simply could not grasp the questions being asked.

While students demonstrated greater diligence in their preparation for the International Relations section, the majority of the candidates could not achieve the required standard, the report said.

“Answers were neither proper nor precise,” the report said.

In 2012,

13,071 applied

9,063 appeared for the exam

786 qualified

604 men

179 women

In 2013,

15,998 applied

11,406 appeared for the exam

238 passed

172 male

66 female

In 2010:

66 vacant positions

In 2012:

45 vacant positions

Published in The Express Tribune, December 15th, 2013.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/645721/w...ing-to-a-halt/
__________________
Forget safety.Live where you fear to live.Destroy your reputation.Be notorious
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Sunday, December 15, 2013
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: rawalpindi originally from ajk
Posts: 62
Thanks: 10
Thanked 16 Times in 13 Posts
Mini98 is on a distinguished road
Question

so what do u think?Kia hmara education standard gir gya hay ya CSS ka level uper ho gya hay ya kuch aur
__________________
Lord grant me strength to change things i can courage to accept things I can’t & wisdom to know the difference
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old Sunday, December 15, 2013
mani g's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 578
Thanks: 227
Thanked 176 Times in 121 Posts
mani g will become famous soon enough
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini98 View Post
so what do u think?Kia hmara education standard gir gya hay ya CSS ka level uper ho gya hay ya kuch aur
Education Level to akhri saansain le raha hai. There are a very few educational institutions in the country which are providing quality education but only the elite of this country can afford to send their childs to those institutions.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pakistan's History From 1947-till present Sumairs Pakistan Affairs 13 Sunday, October 27, 2019 02:55 PM
The constitution of the islamic republic of pakistan, 1973[1] IMTIAZ AHMAD KHAN Constitutional Law 0 Thursday, February 14, 2013 05:40 PM
National Education Policy 2009 Raja Bahar Pakistan Affairs 0 Sunday, June 10, 2012 06:32 PM
Important C.A topics for CE 2011..! Maha Khan Current Affairs 1 Sunday, January 30, 2011 09:56 AM
indo-pak relations atifch Current Affairs 0 Monday, December 11, 2006 09:01 PM


CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of CSSForum.com.pk (unless CSSForum.com.pk is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.