Saturday, March 25, 2023
06:25 PM (GMT +5)

Go Back   CSS Forums > CSS Datesheets and Results > Previous CSS Results and Datesheets

Previous CSS Results and Datesheets Exam Results,Allocations and Datesheets here.

Reply Share Thread: Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook     Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter     Submit Thread to Google+ Google+    
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Thursday, October 06, 2016
safeemailk's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lahore
Posts: 112
Thanks: 19
Thanked 147 Times in 91 Posts
safeemailk will become famous soon enoughsafeemailk will become famous soon enough
Default DMCs 2016 Analysis (Subject wise)

After seeing the dmcs of failed candidates in css-2016 posted uptill now (10:40pm), i give my analysis regarding the scoring trend of the optional subjects here:

all the subjects in this group have been awarded average marks though paper-1 of IR have remained scoring upto 78. Aspirants have attained low score in IR paper-2 as it was much tricky as well as out of syllabus. Upto 130 marks have been noted in IR yet. all other subjects have been remained average scoring subjects. In the subjects of this group it seems that examiner have awarded numbers as aspirants input in the papers

I have seen dmcs with the Physics and maths from this group only which have been average scoring

Town planning have been proved disastrous from this subjects. One aspirant is failed only it TP by getting 17. all other subjects are passed with very good scores
Business ad have been good.
Public ad have not been remained much good
Governance and PP was also average one

In this group Indo pak history remained very awesome with very high socres
US history has also remained very good
Islamic history was average one
no dmcs have been found with British history yet

Environmental sciences have remained good in this group
Gender studies have also been noticed good
others have not been found in any dmcs

Ilaw have been remained very high scoring in this group
philosophy have also been good
In criminology i found contradictory dmcs as one aspirant has been failed in it while other have been given 90 marks

From Psychology, Anthropology and journalism have remained very high scoring
Punjabi is having contradictory dmcs, high scores as well as low

While in Compulsory subjects Current Affairs, Pakistan Affairs and Islamiat have been remained very high scoring and GSA was good scoring subject
Some unexpected result have been seen in Essay and precis

Goodluck to all aspirants who have passed as well as who are rescheduling for the next exam...
Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to safeemailk For This Useful Post:
comp Engr (Monday, January 16, 2017), INNOVATIVE (Thursday, October 13, 2016), LLMMUSLIMFAMILYLAW (Monday, March 20, 2017), Mohib Ullah Ali (Monday, January 23, 2017), policyanalyst (Wednesday, March 08, 2017)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mercantile Law Prepartion letsfly Mercantile Law 2 Sunday, May 11, 2014 02:13 PM
Saperate the Subject & Predicates alijamil Grammar-Section 1 Tuesday, August 20, 2013 07:28 PM
Police Ordinance 2002 rao adeel Police Service of Pakistan 4 Saturday, February 23, 2013 12:01 PM
KPK PSC Announced a Lot of jobs Qacc KPK PSC Others Examinations 13 Saturday, October 20, 2012 04:06 PM
Observations on Performance of Candidates in Written Part of CSS Examination 2009 Last Island Subject Analysis 3 Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:44 PM

CSS Forum on Facebook Follow CSS Forum on Twitter

Disclaimer: All messages made available as part of this discussion group (including any bulletin boards and chat rooms) and any opinions, advice, statements or other information contained in any messages posted or transmitted by any third party are the responsibility of the author of that message and not of (unless is specifically identified as the author of the message). The fact that a particular message is posted on or transmitted using this web site does not mean that CSSForum has endorsed that message in any way or verified the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message. We encourage visitors to the forum to report any objectionable message in site feedback. This forum is not monitored 24/7.

Sponsors: ArgusVision   vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.