#121
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
so two imporve but one loses his position. still it is hard to imagine how you could adjust 13 against 266. my own perception is that all this error has been due to the wrong application of the tie breakers. you people know about the tie breakers? i think i should start next thread. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mahmood For This Useful Post: | ||
sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010), tadap (Friday, June 18, 2010) |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Suppose position number 30 relegated to position number 70. The 70th will be upgraded to number 69, 69th to 68 and so downwards until the merit number 30. 30th being accommodated at number 70, the merit number of 71 will remain unchanged. that is how one demotion can affect 40 positions in total. Same might happen somewhere in 200s or 300s... Thereby affecting 266 people in its totality. That was not too hard to understand by the way.
Regards: |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to teetotaller For This Useful Post: | ||
sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010), Umair Akbar (Friday, June 18, 2010) |
#123
|
||||
|
||||
Papers checked, interview marks given, they are just adding and compiling the list, they can't change your fate. Trust on Almighty Allah, be cool and wait patiently, everything will be in your favor whether failure or success.
__________________
No matter how fast i run or how far i go it wont escape me, pain, misery, emptiness. |
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Xeric For This Useful Post: | ||
fromQAU (Friday, June 18, 2010), sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010), Umair Akbar (Friday, June 18, 2010) |
#124
|
||||
|
||||
It is very simple to understand. Result is the same, but IT had changed it due to some techinical problem/mistake. So now it is corrected and the correct result shows that from the previous/wrong result that was published, there are 266 who improved their marks, 13 are those with less marks than that displayed on the result on 15th and 616 are the same as before.
So there is no way that a new result is published but actually the result was published incorrectly due to human error. Therefore, those who worked hard and deserved to be on the merit will be shown on the new merit list instead of those who did not deserved to be on the top of the list but were added mistakenly. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Engineer Afridi For This Useful Post: | ||
sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010) |
#125
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
When you try, you risk failure. When you don’t try, you ensure it. |
#126
|
||||
|
||||
dear fellows so far i ve kept quite bcoz i don't believe in propaganda and rumours-making. dear fellows now i only speak to request u that plz maintain ur calm...
i c some ppl loosing temperament(well 1 of my friend just lost his nerves...poor guy). i understand that it must b hard for some ppl but thigns like this tragedy r a part of one's life(trust me i know bcoz i was previously not allocated in attempts of 06 & 08). i ve never lost hope and look i got what i deserve. i would wish u to do the same... bol every one
__________________
A diplomat is a man who always remembers a woman's birthday but never remembers her age... |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
yeh kon c jobs hn?
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Drone War (Pakistan History) | Hajirahat | Current Affairs Notes | 9 | Tuesday, July 29, 2014 02:17 PM |
Allocations of CSS-2008 | Kamran | CSS 2008 Exam | 72 | Monday, July 20, 2009 05:12 PM |
Allocations 2007 Announced | saadat110 | CSS 2007 Exam | 31 | Friday, September 19, 2008 05:14 AM |
Allocation 35th CTP | amk | CSS 2006 Exam | 23 | Thursday, July 26, 2007 10:45 PM |