CSS Forums

CSS Forums (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/)
-   CSS 2009 Exam (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-datesheets-results/previous-css-results-datesheets/css-2009-exam/)
-   -   Final merit list of CE-2009 removed from FPSC website (http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-datesheets-results/previous-css-results-datesheets/css-2009-exam/35206-final-merit-list-ce-2009-removed-fpsc-website.html)

sphinx Friday, June 18, 2010 01:25 AM

If we compare the results of these two links provided it is easily infered that one male candidate has failed and 4 female candidates have failed who had earlier qualified the written but failed in the final interview.If we add these candidates in 895 who have qualifeid it becomes 900 candidates as shown by the post of last island .However the post of 15 june says that 905 candidates have qualified where r the other 5 candidates who have qualified the written .

The other question is about the disable candidate .There was no mention of such candidate in the result declared on oct 26.

regards

serene_beauty Friday, June 18, 2010 01:25 AM

@TO ALL,
use media gun.media is still under influence.ask ur friends in media to raise the issue.its not a minor thing but question of all's career.(i am facing problem with my internet therefore cud nt reply) .i'll update when i hear some concrete news.

sphinx Friday, June 18, 2010 01:37 AM

@ raz

Dear brother to me it its a near bit impossible the reason being that it is the result of the CSS examination n not an ordinary document .I havent heard about this thing happening in any examintion .How can the FPSC be so careless .

regards

SikanderHayat007 Friday, June 18, 2010 01:42 AM

[QUOTE]Point to be noted. Recounting is possible. After recounting there might be addition of few candidates. [/QUOTE]@RAZ

I am already of the opinion that there is some gross stoch of fishy ambitions in this latest move of FPSC.
Please not that FPSC has come to rectify the error of adding 5 more candidates to the written qualifier list of 900 candidates making total 905 after a lapse of more than a year????
I construe this to be sheer and wilful neglect on part of FPSC.

Recounting after more than a year??? bla bla

This is the first precedent of its sort.This is CSS result.CSS-2008 was merit wise no contradictions at all.

Regards,

Sikander

Moreover, the start of the list declared my FPSC declares that the listing is in the form of Merit order.Whereas the list is not in merit order.

Please ponder.

sikander

Raz Friday, June 18, 2010 01:43 AM

[QUOTE=SikanderHayat007;193754]@RAZ

I am already of the opinion that there is some gross stoch of fishy ambitions in this latest move of FPSC.
Please not that FPSC has come to rectify the error of adding 5 more candidates to the written qualifier list of 900 candidates making total 905 after a lapse of more than a year????
I construe this to be sheer and wilful neglect on part of FPSC.

Recounting after more than a year??? bla bla

This is the first precedent of its sort.This is CSS result.CSS-2008 was merit wise no contradictions at all.

Regards,

Sikander[/QUOTE]

[COLOR=black][FONT=Verdana]Recounting is not done after a period of one year, rather there is possibility that recounting might have been done in its proper time but as there was no written result available at FPSC website in consolidated form so it remained un-noticed.[/FONT][/COLOR]

SikanderHayat007 Friday, June 18, 2010 01:50 AM

[QUOTE]Recounting is not done after a period of one year, rather there is possibility that recounting might have been done in its proper time but as there was no written result available at FPSC website in consolidated form so it remained un-noticed[/QUOTE]

What written result?What form of result?

The list came into notice just after sphinx raised the matter.Before it,there was no contradiction of what FPSC published on 26 oct 2009 and on 15 june 2010.

In plain words the two previous records of FPSC are clashing with each other.

Regards,

Sikander

Waseem Riaz Khan Friday, June 18, 2010 05:20 AM

Though it is confirmed now that the merit list is going to be revised. I dont think it will change the merit orders of all candidates. Few will be affected. I also heard from a friend(whose brother's close frnd is Assisstant Director in FPSc) that FPSC is also preparing how will it defend itself in courts as new merit order will take many students to courts.
If there really is a big tremor in the new result, it may cost Rana Bhagwan Das his job.

Arfeen Zubair Friday, June 18, 2010 07:50 AM

Dear fellow qualifiers'

1-As far as the inclusion of 5 more candidates in the wriiten result is concerned, applications of a few candidates were rejected before the announcement of the written result.So they appealed and 5 were declared successful after detailed scrutiny.(underage,overage issues etc)

2.There wont be major changes in the result.

Waseem Riaz Khan Friday, June 18, 2010 09:33 AM

News just-in
 
Guys i have talked to 4 different officials of FPSC and they have confirmed that there was a problem with computer. After talking to these folks i was refered to Director CSS office where PA to director(CSS) confirmed that there were some irregularities in the result and that the result is being scrutinized again.
Mere bar bar israr per unhon ne btaya k computer mein koi masla tha, main ne pocha k kaun sa masla and he just skipped that question and said, you will know the result at 4,5 pm in the evening.
Main ne pocha k sir merit order mein kitna farq paray ga, he said "Insha ALLAh koi khas nahi"

DevBaboo Friday, June 18, 2010 10:05 AM

But...But....

FPSC has removed the list after two days of its announcement.They have not cancelled the merit list as there is no notification to such effect..If there was any mishap in the result, the first step on part of FPSC would have been cancellation of the result notification..


06:39 AM (GMT +5)

vBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.