|
Share Thread: Facebook Twitter Google+ |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
tie breakers--the reason for this error?
I dont know if many of you know about the tie breakers in case two or more candidates have the same amount of marks. i think the error was possibly because of the wrong application of those criteria. since most of our candidates are unaware of that criteria, here is how it works. if two candidates have the same score after written and viva, then :
the person who is older ( meaning with the one with earlier date of birth) will be given the higher order of merit. if both have the same date of birth, then the person with the better Viva score goes to the higher merit list. if those are also equal, than the person with the highest score in compulsory subjects gets the higher position. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mahmood For This Useful Post: | ||
sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010), Zahara Alvi (Friday, June 18, 2010) |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If total marks of two candidates are same: 1) One who obtains higher marks in vio voce is placed first 2) Or if vio voce marks of both the candidates are same then marks in compulsory play decissive role 3) Even if marks of vio voce and compulsory are same then age is the deciding factor.
__________________
"Tumhary nafs ki qeemat Janat hay isy Janat say kam qeemat pey na bechna." "Jiyo to istarh ky log tum sy milny ko tarsy; maro to istrah k log tumharee mot par royain" Last edited by Raz; Friday, June 18, 2010 at 07:49 PM. |
The Following User Says Thank You to Raz For This Useful Post: | ||
sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
actually you might be right. i had the same view. but a senior told me that it went the way i had written in my original post. so i wrote that down. yours make more sense.
__________________
Mahmood Khattak Pakistan Customs Service 36th CTP |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
My point of view seems more valid because we have one example in CE-2008 result. I remember there was a tie between two forum members and one who got higher marks in vio voce was placed first. We can search that result from our forum if we want more clarification.
__________________
"Tumhary nafs ki qeemat Janat hay isy Janat say kam qeemat pey na bechna." "Jiyo to istarh ky log tum sy milny ko tarsy; maro to istrah k log tumharee mot par royain" |
The Following User Says Thank You to Raz For This Useful Post: | ||
sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010) |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Here are the rules of FPSC in this matter:
24. (ii) When total marks of more than one candidate are equal, the one who gets more marks in viva voce is treated as higher in merit. If marks in viva voce are also equal, the one who gets more marks in compulsory subjects is treated as higher in merit. If marks in compulsory subjects are also equal the one who is older in age is treated as higher in merit.
__________________
No matter how fast i run or how far i go it wont escape me, pain, misery, emptiness. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Xeric For This Useful Post: | ||
jadoon khan (Sunday, June 20, 2010), sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010) |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
http://www.cssforum.com.pk/css-dates...tive-dmss.html
See the result of F.S. and MHM They have same total marks but merit order got changed as per vio voce marks.
__________________
"Tumhary nafs ki qeemat Janat hay isy Janat say kam qeemat pey na bechna." "Jiyo to istarh ky log tum sy milny ko tarsy; maro to istrah k log tumharee mot par royain" |
The Following User Says Thank You to Raz For This Useful Post: | ||
sehrishkhan123 (Friday, June 18, 2010) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
im also having a tie with shumaila in sindh urban:<
and same is the case with hasan farhaj and razia dosa in sindh urban
__________________
Shallow men believe in luck;Strong men believe in cause and effect. Being defeated is often a temporary condition,Giving up is what makes it permanent. Last edited by Andrew Dufresne; Friday, June 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM. |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Change in Rules
FPSC has recently changed the rules for tie-breakers.
Decisions Taken in 137th Meeting of the Commission held on 23rd January 2010 Issues: i) Determination of Merit of Candidates in Case Total Marks in Written Test, Interview and Age are Similar. The Commission has decided to ascertain merit position in cases where total marks in written test, interview as well as the age was the same as: a) When total marks of written test and interview in respect of more than one candidates are equal, the one who gets higher marks in interview shall be treated as senior in merit; b) When marks of interview and written test are also equal, one who is older in age shall be treated as senior in merit; c) When marks interview/written test are equal as well as date of birth is the same then the one who possesses higher academic qualifications such as M.Phil or Ph.D in the prescribed field where minimum required qualification is Master’s Degree, shall be treated as senior in merit; d) In case of equivalence at (a),(b) & (c) above, the one who has acquired higher Grade/Division/higher percentage of marks in the minimum prescribed qualification, shall be treated as senior in merit; e) In case of equivalence at (a),(b) ,(c) & (d) above, the one who has acquired the minimum prescribed qualification earlier than the other candidates, shall be treated as senior.
__________________
Best end of life is not knowledge but action. Don't limit yourself to what you think people are expecting! |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The failure of Pakistan to develop a political system, | Miss_Naqvi | Pakistan Affairs | 7 | Tuesday, October 20, 2020 07:42 PM |
Introduction to Programmin Languages | Syed Zaffar Iqbal | Computers and Technology | 3 | Saturday, November 30, 2013 12:26 AM |
Statistics and Probability | obaidkhan | Statistics | 3 | Friday, August 23, 2013 02:51 PM |
Does Love need a Reason...?? | fatima khan | Off Topic Lounge | 37 | Thursday, November 23, 2006 12:02 AM |
Can Science Survive? | sibgakhan | Philosophy | 2 | Thursday, March 02, 2006 08:08 PM |